2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of MV-scatter-free kilovoltage CBCT images during RapidArc™ or VMAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing techniques for MV scatter noise correction may further improve the tracking accuracy. These techniques include gating the MV (Ling et al , 2011) or kV beam (van Herk et al , 2011), correction using pre-acquired data (Boylan et al , 2012), and increasing the kV frame rate (Ng et al , 2012). The comparison with the standard of care in terms of the 95th-percentile errors highlighted the potential reduction in margins achievable with markerless tumor tracking, especially for tumors with large SI motions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing techniques for MV scatter noise correction may further improve the tracking accuracy. These techniques include gating the MV (Ling et al , 2011) or kV beam (van Herk et al , 2011), correction using pre-acquired data (Boylan et al , 2012), and increasing the kV frame rate (Ng et al , 2012). The comparison with the standard of care in terms of the 95th-percentile errors highlighted the potential reduction in margins achievable with markerless tumor tracking, especially for tumors with large SI motions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the kV frame rate to be reduced. 13 • Temporarily halting the MV beam during kV acquisition as proposed by Ling et al 28 • Utilizing patient and gantry angle specific field sizes. 13 • Varying the exposure with gantry angle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] One disadvantage of continuous image acquisition during radiation dose delivery is that the kV projections are contaminated with scatter from the MV beam, which negatively affects the quality of the reconstructed image. Although methods to effectively deal with the MV scatter have been proposed, 23,24 they more or less require some modification of the existing system hardware/software. Another drawback is the increased radiation dose from continuous imaging, which is typically 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than our triggered beam-level imaging approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%