2001
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquired Crossed Aphasia in Dextral Children Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most influential and widely held views on CAD of the last decades was advanced by Brown and coworkers in the 1970s (Brown and Wilson, 1973; Brown, 1976; Brown and Hécaen, 1976). In accord with the classical concept of acquired childhood aphasia and aphasia in sinistrals they defined CAD as prototypically non‐fluent and often transient regardless of the lesion site (Mariën et al ., 2001b,c). Many subsequent studies added evidence to this view supporting the concept of more diffuse language representation as the consequence of a disrupted lateralization process (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most influential and widely held views on CAD of the last decades was advanced by Brown and coworkers in the 1970s (Brown and Wilson, 1973; Brown, 1976; Brown and Hécaen, 1976). In accord with the classical concept of acquired childhood aphasia and aphasia in sinistrals they defined CAD as prototypically non‐fluent and often transient regardless of the lesion site (Mariën et al ., 2001b,c). Many subsequent studies added evidence to this view supporting the concept of more diffuse language representation as the consequence of a disrupted lateralization process (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nine of the 19 cases were excluded for the following reasons: non‐vascular aetiology (five cases), familial sinistrality (one case), additional vascular damage to the language areas of the left hemisphere (two cases), incomplete record lacking information on familial left‐handedness, early brain damage and developmental milestones (one case). One case represents CAD in acquired childhood aphasia and was extensively reported previously (Mariën et al ., 2001a; Mariën et al ., 2001b,c). All cases withheld for the present study are adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlapping findings have been obtained (Lurito and Dzemidzic, 2001). Marien et al (2001) also concluded that lateralized cerebral dominance for language represents an innate, predetermined neurobiological system, on the basis of a very rare occurrence of crossed aphasia in dextral children. The association between handedness and language laterality index, and between family history of handedness and language laterality index may indicate a common genetic factor underlying the inheritance of handedness and language lateralization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bereits 1987 wurde von Schweiger die Hypothese aufgestellt, dass metabolische Veränderungen im Hirnstoffwechsel der rechten Hemisphäre einen Einfluss auf die morphologisch intakte linke Hemisphäre haben könnten [53], ohne dass dort eine morphologisch fassbare Läsion nachweisbar ist. Mögliche inhibitorische Prozesse der rechten auf die linke Hemisphäre waren auch der Grund, warum einige Autoren Patienten mit rechtsseitigen, infiltrativ oder raumfordernd wachsenden Hirntumoren aus ihren Datenerhebungen ausschlossen [54]. Schweiger et al konnten in einer PET-Untersuchung an einem Hirninfarktpatienten keinen Beleg für diese Hypothese finden [53].…”
Section: Neurolinguistische Merkmale Der Caunclassified
“…Bei nichtvaskulären Krankheitsbildern (z. B. Hirntumoren [9,10], Epilepsien [11], Schädel-Hirn-Traumata [12], neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen [13], Fallübersichten bei [14,15]), ist es aufgrund unterschiedlicher zugrunde liegender Pathomechanismen besonders wichtig, mittels suffizienter (ggf. auch funktioneller) Bildgebung definitiv (subklinische) linkshemisphärische Läsionen auszuschließen, bevor eine gekreuzte Aphasie diagnostiziert wird [16].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified