No abstract

No abstract

Background and Purpose-The role of mild hyperhomocysteinemia as a risk factor for cerebral ischemia may depend on stroke subtype. To test this hypothesis, we undertook a prospective case-control study of a group of patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD), a group of patients with atherothrombotic stroke (non-CAD), and a group of control subjects. Methods-Fasting total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) concentration, C677T MTHFR genotype, and 844ins68bp CBS genotype were determined in 25 patients with sCAD, 31 patients Ͻ45 years of age with non-CAD ischemic stroke, and 36 control subjects. Biochemical data in the patient groups were obtained within the first 72 hours of stroke onset. Results-Median tHcy levels were significantly higher in patients with sCAD (13.2 mol/L; range, 7 to 32.8 mol/L) compared with control subjects (8.9 mol/L; range, 5 to 17.3 mol/L; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.52; Pϭ0.006). Cases with tHcy concentration above the cutoff level of 12 mol/L were significantly more represented in the group of patients with sCAD compared with control subjects (64% versus 13.9%; 95% CI, 2.25 to 44.23; Pϭ0.003); a significant association between the MTHFR TT genotype and sCAD was also observed (36% versus 11.1%; 95% CI, 1.10 to 19.23; Pϭ0.045). No significant difference in tHcy levels and in the prevalence of thermolabile MTHFR was found between patients with non-CAD ischemic stroke and control subjects and between patients with sCAD and non-CAD ischemic stroke. The distribution of the 844ins68bp CBS genotype and the prevalence of subjects carrying both the TT MTHFR and 844ins68bp CBS genotypes were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Conclusions-Our

•The influence of language rehabilitation on specific language skills (speaking, understanding, writing, and reading) was investigated in 281 aphasic patients (162 reeducated and 119 controls) who were subjected to a second examination no less than six months after the first. The relationship of the following factors to improvement was studied: (a) time between onset of aphasia and first examination; (b) type of aphasia; (c) overall severity of aphasia on first examination; (d) presence or absence of rehabilitation between first and subsequent examination. It was found that rehabilitation had a significant positive effect on improvement in all language skills. Time between onset and first examination and overall severity of aphasia were negatively related to improvement. The relationship of type of aphasia to improvement was not significant. Additional evidence of the efficacy of rehabilitation is provided by experience with patients who began language therapy several months or years after the onset of their language disorder.