“…51 This compromise was necessary to make decisions binding and enforced, since the Court was made optional, 52 but 'the downside, of course, was that final decision would be left to a political body'. 53 When the draft convention was passed back to the Committee of Ministers, Undén insisted the Committee should be authorised only to decide on whether a state had violated the convention, not to dictate to a defaulting state to take measures or pay damages to the injured party. 54 The right of individual petition proved to be a final disputatious subject: 55 voicing fears that it might be abused by subversive forces, some delegates opposed including an automatic petition right; eventually, the Committee agreed to make individual petition optional, too.…”