2021
DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography and liver fibrosis risk scores in severe obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the strong impact of an elevated AST/ALT ratio on BARD score has to be considered, which is not specific for hepatic damage. In a recently published study, the BARD score displayed a lack of specificity for hepatic fibrosis compared to FIB-4, which is in line with our present results [ 30 ]. Furthermore, BARD is primarily applicable in order to predict manifested and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD, whereas NFS represents a reliable tool for the exclusion of individuals with a low risk of fibrosis [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the strong impact of an elevated AST/ALT ratio on BARD score has to be considered, which is not specific for hepatic damage. In a recently published study, the BARD score displayed a lack of specificity for hepatic fibrosis compared to FIB-4, which is in line with our present results [ 30 ]. Furthermore, BARD is primarily applicable in order to predict manifested and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD, whereas NFS represents a reliable tool for the exclusion of individuals with a low risk of fibrosis [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Most studies found that Forns and S-index had a greater diagnostic accuracy than other models, even if the AUROC values of models in various studies were substantially diverse. 35 , 36 Currently, however, the study sample size is too small, and the majority of studies are focused on NAFLD or HCV instead. In this study, we looked at a large group of HBV-positive individuals, a total of 436.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%