2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4865805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic investigation of pressure-dependent resonance and shell elasticity of lipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles

Abstract: In this study, frequency-dependent attenuation was measured acoustically for monodisperse lipidcoated microbubble suspensions as a function of excitation pressure and radius. The resonance frequency was identified from the attenuation spectra and had an inverse relationship with mean microbubble diameter and excitation pressure. A reduction in the estimated shell elasticity constant from 0.50 N/m to 0.29 N/m was observed as the excitation pressure was increased from 25 kPa to 100 kPa, respectively, which sugge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For another type of DSPC-containing microbubble, 10 μm diameter BR14 microbubbles were resonant at 1 MHz (< 40 kPa insonification) [37]. Although it is known that several factors have an influence on the resonance frequency, such as the applied P_ [15, 52] and composition of the lipid coating [19], our finding that smaller microbubbles were at resonance at 1 MHz could also be explained by the difference in diameter as measured with fluorescence and bright field. Microbubbles appear larger in bright field than in fluorescence, because complex images are obtained in bright field due to refraction, i .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another type of DSPC-containing microbubble, 10 μm diameter BR14 microbubbles were resonant at 1 MHz (< 40 kPa insonification) [37]. Although it is known that several factors have an influence on the resonance frequency, such as the applied P_ [15, 52] and composition of the lipid coating [19], our finding that smaller microbubbles were at resonance at 1 MHz could also be explained by the difference in diameter as measured with fluorescence and bright field. Microbubbles appear larger in bright field than in fluorescence, because complex images are obtained in bright field due to refraction, i .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other method could be the use of centrifugation techniques to stack the micobubbles in narrow size ranges [51], then the driving frequency can be chosen so that it drives the majority of each stack into pressure-dependent resonance regime. Through using monodisperse microbubbles [23,52,53], one may fully take advantage of exciting all the microbubbles in the pressuredependent resonance regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28]) where P is pressure and V is the MB volume. Experimental investigation of the pressure and frequency dependence of the attenuation of bubbly media has been limited to few studies of coated MBs suspensions [25,29]. Importantly, the pressure dependence of the sound speed in bubbly media has not been experimentally investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To experimentally explore the pressure-dependent changes of the sound speed and attenuation for coated MBs, monodisperse lipid shell MBs were produced using flow-focusing in a microfluidic device as previously described [29,37]. Figure 2 shows the size distribution of the MBs in our experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%