1994
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9418(94)90042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic impedance and absorption coefficient measurements of porous materials used in the automotive industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5 wt.% PHBV foam was best at low frequency of 500 Hz, while the 25 wt.% PHBV foam was best at a high frequency of 4000 Hz ( Figure 7 a,b). This could be attributed to the large cell size and low foam density displayed by the 5 wt.% PHBV foam and the large air volume contained in the 25 wt.% PHBV foam as shown by its large cell density in Table 3 [ 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 5 wt.% PHBV foam was best at low frequency of 500 Hz, while the 25 wt.% PHBV foam was best at a high frequency of 4000 Hz ( Figure 7 a,b). This could be attributed to the large cell size and low foam density displayed by the 5 wt.% PHBV foam and the large air volume contained in the 25 wt.% PHBV foam as shown by its large cell density in Table 3 [ 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the large pore size (Ø = 123.48 µm) recorded for the 45 wt.% PHBV foam made it the most effective closed cell foam at low frequency as explained earlier. Conclusively, these results have shown that the acoustic behavior of the porous PCL/PHBV blends especially at low frequencies, which may not totally be a function of their bulk densities [ 84 ]. Apart from the influence of cell density on the absorption properties of the open cell foams, their internal discontinuities and extensive mixed cellular morphology impacted their acoustic impedance property.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many modern cellular types of foam, which are trusted and effective acoustic absorbents, are created from polymeric materials by the use of chemical blowing agents [27]. Using this method it is possible to vary the size and geometry of a foams cellular construction, thus altering the size and cell type and changing its acoustic properties [28]. Historically, evaluating the effectiveness of a given foam or combination of foam layers at absorbing sound energy has been done using experimental measurements [29].…”
Section: Acoustic Treatments In Vehicle Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, all PC foams investigated in the literature either are closed cells foams or those with open‐cell, their sound and thermal insulation behavior were not scientifically examined. Closed cell foams would show a reasonable thermal insulating behavior, but their sound insulation properties would, as usual, be very low . For sound waves to be attenuated by the foam, cells must be interconnected so that air particles can pass through them …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%