2013
DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2013.848937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic evaluation of the cathedral of Seville as a concert hall and proposals for improving the acoustic quality perceived by listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reverberant sound absorption coefficients α, chosen from the literature (Martellotta, 2009;Martellotta et al, 2011;Vorländer, 2008;Carmona et al, 2009;Meyer, 2003) and assigned to each area, correspond to the finishing materials of the church (Table 1). Sound scattering coefficients s (Table 1) were matched to the type of materials with smooth surfaces (for example: walls or marble floor), moderately irregular (for example, domes and arches) and irregular (for example, the altar) (Alonso et al, 2014).…”
Section: Acoustic Model Of the Churchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reverberant sound absorption coefficients α, chosen from the literature (Martellotta, 2009;Martellotta et al, 2011;Vorländer, 2008;Carmona et al, 2009;Meyer, 2003) and assigned to each area, correspond to the finishing materials of the church (Table 1). Sound scattering coefficients s (Table 1) were matched to the type of materials with smooth surfaces (for example: walls or marble floor), moderately irregular (for example, domes and arches) and irregular (for example, the altar) (Alonso et al, 2014).…”
Section: Acoustic Model Of the Churchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the calculation procedure shown above to determine the value of the RMS index, which concerned the case of the unoccupied church, the value of the RMS occ index was calculated, which corresponded to the occupied church. The values of acoustic parameters, averaged in space and frequency, such as: After putting the partial indices RMS (RMS occ ) and D into Formula (1), the values of GAP = 0.54 for the unoccupied church and GAP occ = 0.79 for the church with the audience were obtained. The calculated values of the four partial indices and the single-number global index of acoustic properties of the St. Elizabeth of Hungary Church for unoccupied and occupied cases are shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Global Index Of Acoustic Properties Of Roman Catholic Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the aim of this paper is to address a very specific problem that arose while investigating the effect of ephemeral architecture on the acoustics of ancient churches (Alonso et al 2014). The problem is that of establishing the best way to model textile materials hung free in space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been found in other monumental churches. [8][9][10] Acoustic properties of the materials…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%