2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic evaluation and adjustment of an open-plan office through architectural design and noise control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In papers [27,28], authors studied the noise level in office premises, but did not propose the ways to solve the problem. The authors of [29] explored the acoustic properties of the "Open space" office and made conclusions that it is necessary to use partitions and sound absorbing ceiling in order to increase acoustic comfort.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In papers [27,28], authors studied the noise level in office premises, but did not propose the ways to solve the problem. The authors of [29] explored the acoustic properties of the "Open space" office and made conclusions that it is necessary to use partitions and sound absorbing ceiling in order to increase acoustic comfort.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on those simulation models, effects of different factors were investigated. Using the acoustic rays and particle tracing technology, Passero and Zannin [32] evaluated the acoustic quality of real openplan office and improved the acoustic condition of the office by performing modifications on the office room. Their study concluded that divider panels between the work stations and ceilings with high sound-absorbing materials could ensure the acoustic quality.…”
Section: Reverberation Time Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real situations, reverberation time of a room is affected by many factors, including room size [4,23], enclosure shape [13], materials of walls and ceilings [32], absorption of seats and audiences [11,12,25]. In the acoustic design process, all those factors require careful considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different physical discomforts derived from poor IEQ, fatigue condition and sick building syndrome have been reported as the most common discomforts in buildings (Musa et al, 2012;Mendell and Heath, 2004;Tarcan and Varol, 2004;Frontczak and Wargocki, 2011;Issa et al, 2011). Studies also show that the health impairment of students and teachers resulting from poor IEQ could influence students' performance, behavior, and productivity (Mendell and Heath, 2004;Treputtharata and Tayiam, 2014;Lee et al, 2012;Earthman, 2004;Huang et al, 2012;Passero andZannin, 2012 andHawes et al, 2012). Uline and Moran (2008) have reported the lack of tendency of academics to focus when the learning process is taking place in imperfect environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical comfort, which refers to satisfaction of fundamental needs of occupants such as adequate lighting and space allocation for each individual, and psychological comforts, involving satisfaction of occupants with their colleagues, management, and feeling of enjoyment are factors associated with the occupants' comfort with regard to IEQ. Many studies (Montzamani et al, 2012;Putih et al, 2014;Mendell and Heath, 2004;Treputtharata and Tayiam, 2014;Sulaiman et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2012;Passero andZannin, 2012 andHawes et al, 2012) have identified the contribution of both physical and psychological factors associated with the occupants' satisfaction in various workplaces. However, the concept of IEQ has gained more prominence as the lifestyle in developed countries has resulted people spending the majority of their time (approximately 90%) within indoor environments (U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%