2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic emission as a tool to assess the changes induced by pulsed electric field in apple tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the PEF treatment caused more pronounced structural damages, which are enlarged by the sonication process lasting 30 min. Similar results were noticed by Rajewska and Mierzwa [ 43 ] and Wiktor et al [ 44 ], which revealed that PEF treatment plays a major role in hybrid methods. Additionally, the use of the higher specific energy intake for PEF treatment, regardless of application to single or hybrid novel treatment, did not result in significant ( p > 0.05) changes of sample porosity in comparison with freeze-dried material treated with lower specific energy intake of PEF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This means that the PEF treatment caused more pronounced structural damages, which are enlarged by the sonication process lasting 30 min. Similar results were noticed by Rajewska and Mierzwa [ 43 ] and Wiktor et al [ 44 ], which revealed that PEF treatment plays a major role in hybrid methods. Additionally, the use of the higher specific energy intake for PEF treatment, regardless of application to single or hybrid novel treatment, did not result in significant ( p > 0.05) changes of sample porosity in comparison with freeze-dried material treated with lower specific energy intake of PEF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A 4-mm diameter probe (TA-54, Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Godalming, UK) and a Texture Exponent 32 software (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Godalming, UK) were used for the analysis. Pre-test, test, post-test speeds and strain rate were adjusted to 3, 1, 10 mm/s and 90%, respectively [29] . Ten replications were performed for each treatment and the average of the ten readings were reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening methods based on several physical approaches have been proposed to directly estimate the extent of electroporation, especially in its irreversible form, and consequently to optimize the novel industrial PEF applications. Those procedures include the evaluation of the electrical impedance (Lebovka, Bazhal, & Vorobiev, 2002), optical (Fincan & Dejmek, 2002), acoustic (Wiktor, et al, 2016) or magnetic (Dellarosa, Ragni, Laghi, Tylewicz, Rocculi, & Dalla Rosa, 2016b) properties of the plant material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%