1956
DOI: 10.2307/411004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Cues for Nasal Consonants: An Experimental Study Involving a Tape-Splicing Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in fact showed evidence for higher saliency of oral stops' place contrasts in the speech reception threshold condition, but also showed the evidence for the opposite pattern in the other three conditions. However, these results should again be interpreted with caution, because the experiment artificially removed bursts from the stimuli, which crucially affects the perceptibility of place contrasts (Kochetov & So, 2007;Malécot, 1956;Smits et al, 1996;Stevens & Blumstein, 1978;Tekieli & Cullinan, 1979;Winitz et al, 1972). This concern is not a trivial one, because in English even pre-consonantal consonants are often accompanied by a burst (Henderson & Repp, 1982).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results in fact showed evidence for higher saliency of oral stops' place contrasts in the speech reception threshold condition, but also showed the evidence for the opposite pattern in the other three conditions. However, these results should again be interpreted with caution, because the experiment artificially removed bursts from the stimuli, which crucially affects the perceptibility of place contrasts (Kochetov & So, 2007;Malécot, 1956;Smits et al, 1996;Stevens & Blumstein, 1978;Tekieli & Cullinan, 1979;Winitz et al, 1972). This concern is not a trivial one, because in English even pre-consonantal consonants are often accompanied by a burst (Henderson & Repp, 1982).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Beddor & Evans-Romaine (1995) suggest that "[a]n acoustic-perceptual account of nasal place assimilation might argue that place distinctions are perceptually less salient for nasal consonants than for oral stops" (p.147) and conclude that "place of articulation in syllable-final nasals is not perceptually robust" (p. 164). See also Martin & Peperkamp (2011) for general discussion of this view; for studies on general acoustic and perceptual characteristics of nasal place contrasts, see Beddor & Evans-Romaine (1995), Fujimura (1962), Kurowski & Blumstein (1984), Kurowski & Blumstein (1993), Malécot (1956), Narayan (2008), Repp (1986), and references cited therein.…”
Section: The Issue-why Do Nasals Assimilate In Place?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of them reported a speech hearing disorder or problem. Fifteen native Korean listeners were recruited 2 It is well-known that release bursts of post-vocalic (coda) stops affects and changes perceptibility of stops (Kochetov & So 2007, Malécot 1956, Repp 1984. Although the production of English stops often accompanies a release burst (Henderson & Repp 1982), or at least is considered a more canonical form among many allophonic variants (Sumner & Samuel 2005, Chang 2014), data from speech corpora suggest that a substantial proportion of stops are produced unreleased (Davidson 2011).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that vowel transitions also carry place cues for nasal stops, the decision not to base the Perceptual Nasal-Stop Place Hierarchy on them was made for the following reason. Studies such as Cooper et al (1952), Liberman et al (1954), Malécot (1956), and Delattre (1958) have revealed that the F2 and F3 transition shapes which cue place of articulation in nasal stops are similar to those that serve the same purpose in their oral counterparts. That is to say that there is acoustic parallelism among the members of the sets /m b p/, /n d t/, and /ŋ ɡ k/.…”
Section: The Perceptual Cost Of Place Features In Nasal Stopsmentioning
confidence: 99%