2022
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12081803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic and Thermal Properties of Particleboards Made from Mulberry Wood (Morus alba L.) Pruning Residues

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the acoustic and thermal properties of particleboards made from mulberry wood pruning waste using urea formaldehyde resin (UF) as a binder. The investigation focused on the evaluation of the thermal conductivity and the acoustic absorption of the boards and the assessment of their feasibility for use in the construction sector. The mean thermal conductivity values of the particleboards (0.065–0.068 W/mK) were lower than those obtained in wood and similar to those in cork … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, panels with a 30% ratio of surface layers were found to absorb sound better due to their lower density and higher porosity [ 46 ]. According to ISO 11654 [ 47 ], the TOCS-based particleboards produced in this study were compliant with the sound absorption coefficient level rating for rooms with sound absorption classes D and C. In terms of particle geometry Ferrandez-Villena et al reported that, in the same density, panels with bigger particles indicated better sound absorption coefficient [ 48 ]. The reason for this conclusion is that bigger particles create more empty spaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Additionally, panels with a 30% ratio of surface layers were found to absorb sound better due to their lower density and higher porosity [ 46 ]. According to ISO 11654 [ 47 ], the TOCS-based particleboards produced in this study were compliant with the sound absorption coefficient level rating for rooms with sound absorption classes D and C. In terms of particle geometry Ferrandez-Villena et al reported that, in the same density, panels with bigger particles indicated better sound absorption coefficient [ 48 ]. The reason for this conclusion is that bigger particles create more empty spaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Alamsyah et al [ 33 ] in their study indicate that IB results can be influenced by the mixing of particles with glue, sheet molding, and pressing and that the higher bulk density of the alternative raw material translates into higher IB results. In another study, the researchers used mulberry branches for particleboard, and the IB study obtained the following results sequentially for variants depending on particles size: 0.25–1 mm—1.43 N mm −2 , 1–2 mm—1.54 N mm −2 , and 2–4 mm—2.30 N mm −2 , at a particleboard density of 800–830 kg m −3 [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%