2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gc003169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic and mechanical properties of Nankai accretionary prism core samples

Abstract: [1] We studied undeformed sediment and accreted strata recently recovered by Ocean Drilling Program/ Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (ODP/IODP) drilling in Nankai Trough convergent margin to unravel the changes in physical properties from initial deposition to incipient deformation. We have derived acoustic (V p ) and mechanical (uniaxial poroelastic compliance, compaction amplitude) properties of samples from various drill sites along the Muroto (ODP 1173) and Kii transects (IODP C0001, C0002, C0006, and C0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(139 reference statements)
6
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ash-rich USB facies, for example, high silica concentrations of up to 800-1000 µM in pore waters facilitated precipitation of amorphous silica. This effect has led to the formation of a Nankai margin-wide zone of anomalously high porosity, which was suggested to be caused by diagenetic cementation (e.g., Spinelli et al, 2007;Raimbourg et al, 2011;White et al, 2011). However, low measured values of cohesion in intact samples from Sites C0011 and C0012 indicate a lack of cementation (Ikari et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Diagenetic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the ash-rich USB facies, for example, high silica concentrations of up to 800-1000 µM in pore waters facilitated precipitation of amorphous silica. This effect has led to the formation of a Nankai margin-wide zone of anomalously high porosity, which was suggested to be caused by diagenetic cementation (e.g., Spinelli et al, 2007;Raimbourg et al, 2011;White et al, 2011). However, low measured values of cohesion in intact samples from Sites C0011 and C0012 indicate a lack of cementation (Ikari et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Diagenetic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[7] Five categories of facies are found [Kinoshita et al, 2009] (Figure 3): (1) the slope apron mainly composed of silty clay to clayey silt hemipelagites and volcanic ash, (2) accreted sediments composed of fine-grained terrigenous material and hemipelagites, (3) Kumano fore-arc basin sediments mainly composed of sandy turbidites and hemipelagic mud, (4) trench sediments composed of silt, sand-and gravel-bearing turbidites and muddy marine sediments, and (5) the Upper Shikoku Basin composed of silty clay to clayey silt hemipelagites and volcanic ash. A weak cementation may be present in this facies [Kinoshita et al, 2009], and in the accreted sediments of Site C0001, at least in the cored interval (down to ∼450 m), [Hashimoto et al, 2010;Raimbourg et al, 2011], but it is absent at the other sites [Raimbourg et al, 2011]. [8] Overall, the XRD analysis at the Kumano transect [Kinoshita et al, 2009] indicates that the clay mineral content (relative to silt) increases from the hemipelagic mud of the Kumano fore-arc basin, to slope sediments, to accreted trench sediments, and then to accreted sediments and Upper Shikoku Basin sediments (Figure 4).…”
Section: Geological Background Drilled Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shipboard P wave velocities were corrected empirically by a fit of log data, which was not fully satisfactory for confinement [Kinoshita et al, 2009]. A P wave velocity correction based upon shore-based P wave measurements was subsequently performed on samples from the accretionary wedge lithological unit at Site C0001 for confining pressures ranging from 3 to 30 MPa [Raimbourg et al, 2011]. Assuming hydrostatic pore pressure conditions, the following correction is proposed (see auxiliary material):…”
Section: Accreted Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, our experimental results can be considered as coarse indicators of the magnitude of the deformation to be expected, whatever the precise loading conditions, and we use them in this sense in the following. This assumption is further supported by our experimental measurements (Raimbourg et al, 2011), showing that, at least in the poroelastic field, the mechanical anisotropy is very limited, so that measurements done in an arbitrary direction are to some extent representative of sample response in every direction.…”
Section: δH'mentioning
confidence: 61%