2016
DOI: 10.12957/reuerj.2016.15577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acompanhamento presencial e telefônico dos sintomas em mulheres com câncer de mama submetidas à quimioterapia [In-person and telephone monitoring of symptoms in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy]

Abstract: RESUMOObjetivo: identificar os sintomas mais prevalentes durante o tratamento quimioterápico em mulheres com câncer de mama. Método: trata-se de um estudo descritivo, prospectivo e com abordagem quantitativa, constituído por 15 mulheres avaliadas no dia da infusão e semanalmente via telefone. A pesquisa ocorreu no período de março a dezembro de 2014 numa central de quimioterapia no Rio de Janeiro. O projeto foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa, número do parecer: 544.459 e Certificado de Apresentação … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a statistical power of 95%, with a sampling error of 5% and an estimated 58.86% prevalence of adverse effects (nausea) associated with chemotherapy, 37 a final sample of 33 patients was estimated. It was estimated that 60 patients meeting inclusion criteria would be treated in both hospitals during the year of 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a statistical power of 95%, with a sampling error of 5% and an estimated 58.86% prevalence of adverse effects (nausea) associated with chemotherapy, 37 a final sample of 33 patients was estimated. It was estimated that 60 patients meeting inclusion criteria would be treated in both hospitals during the year of 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results provide information on fall risk factors, mechanisms and possible mitigation strategies Regarding the characteristics of the studies, the country with the highest number of studies on the theme was the United States n = 7 (36.8%), followed by Asian countries n = 5 (26.3%), Brazil n = 3 (15.7%), UK n = 2 (10.5%), Turkey and Australia n = 1 (5.2%). Regarding the study design, the following results were obtained: randomized controlled trials (3,27,29,32) n = 4; randomized trials (22,24) n = 2; quasi-experimental (2,23,26) n = 3; observational (4,8,33) , descriptive (20,25,30) n = 3; qualitative (1,21,31) n = 3; and mixed (28) n = 1. Thus, the studies were classified according to levels of evidence: six with LE 2; three with LE 3; three with LE 4; and six with LE 6.…”
Section: (2015) Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instruments for assessing the effects caused by the follow-up methodology were widely used, and most included scales and questionnaires, except for a Brazilian study (30) . Among the results of the intervention, the most predominant were effects related to management and control of symptoms n = 14 (73.6%), specifically: nausea and vomiting: (n = 1); fatigue (n = 1); neurotoxicity (n = 1) and set of symptoms (n = 11), followed by Patient Satisfaction n = 8 (42.1%); Health-related quality of life assessment n = 5 (26.3%); Self-efficacy capacity n = 4 (21%); Emotional support (anxiety and depression) n = 3 (15.7%); and Caregiver stress n = 1 (5.2%).…”
Section: (2015) Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%