2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.793047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACLV degradation: root cause analysis and effective monitoring strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also report that there is a form of transmission loss that develops most strongly around the periphery of the image area, which coincidentally is the region of the reticle where field induction is strongest. 2 This would cause ACLV in a similar way to the Sun Effect, 13 but with the opposite radial characteristic.…”
Section: How Electric Field Damages a Reticlementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also report that there is a form of transmission loss that develops most strongly around the periphery of the image area, which coincidentally is the region of the reticle where field induction is strongest. 2 This would cause ACLV in a similar way to the Sun Effect, 13 but with the opposite radial characteristic.…”
Section: How Electric Field Damages a Reticlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…13,14 In EFM type 1, the thermal diffusion is enhanced by the presence of an electric field, while in the Sun Effect it is enhanced by the absorption of 193 nm UV photons.…”
Section: How Electric Field Damages a Reticlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After many wafer exposures over a long period, some 193nm binary photomasks started to cause dramatic defectivity issues on production lots, such as bridging or pattern collapses, as shown in figures 1 and 2 below. It seems that all 193nm binary photomasks may be impacted in the industry, as described in literature [1], [2], [3], [4] . This phenomenon is commonly named as chrome oxidation, or chrome migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If not detected early enough, this CDU degradation may cause defectivity issues and lower yield on wafers. Fortunately, a standard cleaning and repellicle service at the mask shop has been demonstrated as efficient to remove the grown materials and get the photomask CD back on target [2], [4] .Some detection methods have been already described in literature, such as wafer CD intrafield monitoring (ACLV) [2] , giving reliable results but also consuming additional SEM time with less precision than direct photomask measurement. In this paper, we propose another approach, by monitoring the CDU directly on the photomask, concurrently with defect inspection for regular requalification to production for wafer fabs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation