2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acidification of primeval forests in the Ukraine Carpathians: Vegetation and soil changes over six decades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This species was also weakened by increasing ungulate densities [14]. Higher temperatures and longer vegetation periods coupled with nitrogen deposition may have also contributed to more exuberant ground vegetation [23,79], which represents a greater obstacle for the development of conifer seedlings than those of beech [16].…”
Section: Historical Evidence and Possible Causes Of Beech Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species was also weakened by increasing ungulate densities [14]. Higher temperatures and longer vegetation periods coupled with nitrogen deposition may have also contributed to more exuberant ground vegetation [23,79], which represents a greater obstacle for the development of conifer seedlings than those of beech [16].…”
Section: Historical Evidence and Possible Causes Of Beech Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with soil acidification, changes in the light conditions of Carpathian forests have seldom been reported (Šamonil, Vrška 2007;Durak 2010;Šebesta et al 2011), and the observations do not agree with each other. In the present study, an increased share of understorey species with high light Ellenberg's Indicator Values was detected, but only the change of weighted AIV L was judged to be statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The AIV N decrease was interpreted as the consequence of silvicultural operations. Some researchers (Šamonil, Vrška 2007;Durak 2010;Šebesta et al 2011) reported changes of AIV L, but as pointed out by Diekmann (2003), the reliability of this light-related parameter is low, as its values do not correlate well with measured light intensity over short gradients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Resurvey studies investigated the understorey to detect potential long-term changes and to assess the role of different environmental variables as driving forces in deciduous forests. The observed changes were attributed to different background causes, such as combined effect of temperature increase and canopy opening (De Frenne et al 2013, abandonment of former forest management practices (Hédl et al 2010, Heinrichs et al 2014, lack of disturbance (Brewer 1980, Taverna et al 2005, deer herbivory (Rooney and Dress 1997, Taverna et al 2005, Wiegmann and Waller 2006, increased soil acidity (Falkengren-Grerup and Tyler 1991, Durak 2010, Šebesta et al 2011, nitrogen deposition (Verheyen et al 2012) and often the intermingled influence of several factors (Heinrichs et al 2014, Vanhellemont et al 2014, Bernhardt-Römermann et al 2015, Naaf and Kolk 2016. The majority of the observed changes in the herbaceous layer show an explicit trend, as a consequence of direct or indirect anthropogenic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These short-and long-term changes in the herbaceous layer are most often detected by resurveys of phytosociological relevés or smaller quadrats after a few years (Ujházy et al 2007, Martináková andMartinák 2012), one or a few decades (Davison and Forman 1982, Taverna et al 2005, Łysik 2008, Vanhellemont et al 2014 or even after a half-century interval (Brewer 1980, Hédl 2004, Durak 2010, 2012, Hédl et al 2010, Šebesta et al 2011. In some cases the relocation can be precise, when the time span is short or permanent corner markers were used, but more often former plots are relocated only approximately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%