2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid modified carbon coated monolith for methyl orange adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, after oxidation, a significant increase in the concentration of the oxygenated surface groups was observed [37]. The nitric acid oxidation generates both the increase of low-temperature, hydroxyl and carboxylic groups, and the high-temperature, phenolic, carbonyl, anhydride and quinonic surface groups.…”
Section: Chemical Surface Composition Of Activated Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…As expected, after oxidation, a significant increase in the concentration of the oxygenated surface groups was observed [37]. The nitric acid oxidation generates both the increase of low-temperature, hydroxyl and carboxylic groups, and the high-temperature, phenolic, carbonyl, anhydride and quinonic surface groups.…”
Section: Chemical Surface Composition Of Activated Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The MO molecule was present in the solution as quinone and azo structures (pK a ¼ 3.47, Scheme 2), depending on the solution pH. 24 It is predicted that the azo structure should have a more conjugated p system 25 than its quinone counterpart. Indeed, the adsorption capacity for MO under basic conditions was found to be higher than that under acidic conditions, predicting the role of p-p stacking interactions in the dye adsorption on TPP-NH 2 .…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Adsorption Of Meb And Mo On Tpp-nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than activated carbon, the other adsorbents have some undesirable disadvantages in dye removal such as complex separation techniques from the adsorbate, little or no resistance against acid solutions, and poor mechanical strength and versatility. Additionally, these adsorbents need a long contact time with the adsorbate [18][19][20][21][22]. Therefore, with a high specific surface area, large pore volume, suitable pore size (2-50 nm), high degree of surface reactivity and effective adsorption quality, activated carbon has become the most desirable adsorbent [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Ftir Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%