2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Optimal Lipid Goals in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that clinicians should consider more intense lipidlowering therapy with combination lipid-lowering drugs in patients with the metabolic syndrome to better target their lipid goals and further reduce CV risk. These findings are not a surprise and are consistent with other studies that have shown that most high-risk patients do not achieve their optimal LDL and non-HDL cholesterol goals in clinical practice [16,17]. The strengths of this study are the large patient number and that the analysis was performed not just by the Chinese guidelines, but also by the American NCEP ATP III guidelines.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The authors concluded that clinicians should consider more intense lipidlowering therapy with combination lipid-lowering drugs in patients with the metabolic syndrome to better target their lipid goals and further reduce CV risk. These findings are not a surprise and are consistent with other studies that have shown that most high-risk patients do not achieve their optimal LDL and non-HDL cholesterol goals in clinical practice [16,17]. The strengths of this study are the large patient number and that the analysis was performed not just by the Chinese guidelines, but also by the American NCEP ATP III guidelines.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Given the high risk population involved, it is 168 noteworthy that 87 % of patients with proven CHD were on 169 lipid-lowering therapy and over 80 % had achieved LDLc 170 levels \3.00 mmol/L with 54 % achieving LDLc levels 171 below 2.50 mmol/l. These findings are not as good as pre-172 vious studies where 73 and 79 % of patients achieved target 173 LDLc levels (\ 2.50 mmol/L) [8,9]. However it must be 174 noted that patient data recorded for the present study was 175 based on older LDLc guidelines (\ 3.00 mmol/L).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…(24,25) Although the guidelines recommend a goal of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL for patients with EAD, LDL-C goal attainment rates remain low worldwide and have been reported to be in the range of 17%-35%. (3)(4)(5)(26)(27)(28)(29) Some studies (3,8,26) that were conducted when the recommended guideline was based on the 2004 updated National Cholesterol Education Program III (30) have suggested setting LDL-C goals of 100 mg/dL before considering the use of a non-statin drug, such as ezetimibe. Similar to these other studies, (3,8,26) our patients with EAD had a high undertreatment rate in terms of LDL-C reduction even though most patients received statins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%