2012
DOI: 10.1680/cien.11.00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving more for less at Canary Wharf Crossrail station, London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, past groundwater abstraction has resulted in the classic under-drained profile that is seen throughout London today. The groundwater profile is presented in Yeow et al (2012). The decline in abstraction rates since the 1960s has resulted in a rise in the water level, which has been well documented since Simpson et al (1989).…”
Section: Hydrogeologymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, past groundwater abstraction has resulted in the classic under-drained profile that is seen throughout London today. The groundwater profile is presented in Yeow et al (2012). The decline in abstraction rates since the 1960s has resulted in a rise in the water level, which has been well documented since Simpson et al (1989).…”
Section: Hydrogeologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This allowed back analysis of the east and west cofferdam end (head) walls and the implementation of the observational method, which led to the omission of the temporary props from the constructions sequence. This is explained in detail by Yeow et al (2012).…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The undrained shear strength was obtained from both triaxial tests on 100 mm samples of rotary cores and U100s from boreholes at the WTH site and from correlation with in situ SPTs. Soil stiffness values in the Lambeth Beds of E u /c u ¼ 2000 were adopted (based on experience at Canary Wharf Crossrail Station) (Yeow et al, 2012). Conforming and MP geotechnical parameters, piezometric pressures and soil stiffness values for the WTH box are shown in Figure 2 and tabulated in Table 4.…”
Section: 'Most Probable' Back Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%