Abstract:Business Model (BM) Innovations aim at making systemic changes in the business logic of companies when they are bringing innovative products and services to the market. Companies should be sensitive to changes in their business environment and able to modify their BMs in an agile way. To assess the agility of BMI during specific market entry situations, this paper uses a method that stress tests the value proposition and the components of a BM against contingent uncertainties. We present three qualitative case… Show more
“…Continuous business model renewal [7] and continuous business model 'stress testing' [23] are considered as important elements of leadership processes related to enabling enterprise agility. In addition to continuous evaluation of risks and uncertainties related to the business model, Bowman et al [23], Doz et al [7] and Teece et al [6] have addressed the leadership role in conjunction with business model innovation and ability to continuously evaluate opportunistically alternatives related to elements of a business model [24]. Table 1 summarises their viewpoints on dimensions of agile capabilities and leadership activities for enabling enterprise agility.…”
Section: Defining Enterprise Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business-Driven Approach (Strategic Orientation Towards Agility). The businessdriven approach takes a business level viewpoint such as business model stress testing [23] and continuous business model renewal [7,32]. This could mean for example strategic orientation towards leveraging state-of-the-art digital services and architectures for doing business and/or continuously evaluating alternative revenue streams and channels for deploying customer value.…”
Section: Summary Of Approaches For Achieving Enterprise Agilitymentioning
Enterprise agility requires capabilities to transform, sense and seize new business opportunities more quickly than competitors. However, acquiring those capabilities, such as continuous delivery and scaling agility to product programmes, portfolios and business models, is challenging in many organisations. This paper introduces definitions of enterprise agility involving business management and cultural lenses for analysing large-scale agile transformation. The case organisation, in the higher education domain, leverages collaborative discovery sprints and an experimental programme to enable a bottom-up approach to transformation. Meanwhile the prevalence of bureaucracy and organisational silos are often contradictory to agile principles and values. The case study results identify transformation challenges based on observations from a five-month research period. Initial findings indicate that increased focus on organisational culture and leveraging of both bottom-up innovation and supportive top-down leadership activities, could enhance the likelihood of a successful transformation.
“…Continuous business model renewal [7] and continuous business model 'stress testing' [23] are considered as important elements of leadership processes related to enabling enterprise agility. In addition to continuous evaluation of risks and uncertainties related to the business model, Bowman et al [23], Doz et al [7] and Teece et al [6] have addressed the leadership role in conjunction with business model innovation and ability to continuously evaluate opportunistically alternatives related to elements of a business model [24]. Table 1 summarises their viewpoints on dimensions of agile capabilities and leadership activities for enabling enterprise agility.…”
Section: Defining Enterprise Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business-Driven Approach (Strategic Orientation Towards Agility). The businessdriven approach takes a business level viewpoint such as business model stress testing [23] and continuous business model renewal [7,32]. This could mean for example strategic orientation towards leveraging state-of-the-art digital services and architectures for doing business and/or continuously evaluating alternative revenue streams and channels for deploying customer value.…”
Section: Summary Of Approaches For Achieving Enterprise Agilitymentioning
Enterprise agility requires capabilities to transform, sense and seize new business opportunities more quickly than competitors. However, acquiring those capabilities, such as continuous delivery and scaling agility to product programmes, portfolios and business models, is challenging in many organisations. This paper introduces definitions of enterprise agility involving business management and cultural lenses for analysing large-scale agile transformation. The case organisation, in the higher education domain, leverages collaborative discovery sprints and an experimental programme to enable a bottom-up approach to transformation. Meanwhile the prevalence of bureaucracy and organisational silos are often contradictory to agile principles and values. The case study results identify transformation challenges based on observations from a five-month research period. Initial findings indicate that increased focus on organisational culture and leveraging of both bottom-up innovation and supportive top-down leadership activities, could enhance the likelihood of a successful transformation.
“…Business model research in Electronic Markets dates back to the seminal paper in issue 8/2 (Timmers 1998) and has seen two dedicated special issues and many articles on the topic since. The present contribution adds a new aspect, which focusses on BAchieving agility using business model stress testing^and was authored by Harry Bouwman, Jukka Heikkilä, Marikka Heikkilä and Carlo Leopold (Bouwman et al 2018). Contrary to existing research, which discussed various forms (Btypologies^) and elements (Bbuilding blocks^) of business models as well as methodologies for designing business models (Alt and Zimmermann 2014a, 233), this article conceives business models themselves as objects of change.…”
“…El enfoque del aprendizaje (14,3%) introduce el tema de la estrategia como práctica (Stefanovic y Milosevic, 2012) y el rol simbólico de los BM (Hacklin y Wallnöfer, 2012). El enfoque prescriptivo (9,5%), enfatiza en las opciones tácticas (Haubro et al, 2015) y las técnicas y herramientas estratégicas para la evaluación de los negocios (Bouwman et al, 2018). El enfoque integrador (9,5%), aborda la gestión de los BM y las transformaciones estructurales (Tallman et al, 2018;Brea-Solis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Panorama Y Futuras Líneas De Trabajounclassified
ResumenEste artículo presenta un panorama de la literatura sobre enfoques estratégicos de los modelos de negocios. Su objetivo es proponer una clasificación para delimitar futuras líneas de trabajo que reconcilien las diferentes tendencias que presentan las investigaciones en este tema. La metodología empleada combina la búsqueda sistemática con la narrativa. La sistemática se realiza con la ayuda de la plataforma web Tree of Science, mientras que la narrativa se realiza a través de la consulta en las principales revistas que publican sobre el tema. Se identifican siete enfoques estratégicos: prescriptivo, cognitivo, contextual, del aprendizaje, cultural, sustentable e integrador. Se concluye que las perspectivas más consolidadas son la prescriptiva y del aprendizaje, seguidas de la contextual y sustentable. Las menos desarrolladas son la cognitiva, cultural e integradora. El enfoque sustentable requiere mayor investigación, ya que es reconocido como uno de los retos que enfrentan los negocios, perfilándose como una línea de investigación prometedora.
Palabras clave: estrategia; estrategia de negocios; modelo de negocios; Árbol de la Ciencia; enfoque estratégico
AbstractThis article presents an overview of the literature on strategic approaches of business models. Its objective is to propose a classification to delimit future lines of work that reconcile the different tendencies that the investigations in this area present. The methodology used combines the systematic search with the narrative. The web platform Tree of Science was used to carry out the systematic review, while the narrative search is done through consultation in the main journals that publish on the subject. Seven strategic approaches are identified: prescriptive, cognitive, contextual, learning, cultural, sustainable and integrative. It is concluded that the most consolidated perspectives are prescriptive and learning, followed by contextual and sustainable. The least developed approaches are the cognitive, cultural and integrative, emerging as promising lines of research. The sustainable approach requires additional research, since it is recognized as one of the challenges that businesses face, emerging as a promising line of research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.