The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-016-0243-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving agility using business model stress testing

Abstract: Business Model (BM) Innovations aim at making systemic changes in the business logic of companies when they are bringing innovative products and services to the market. Companies should be sensitive to changes in their business environment and able to modify their BMs in an agile way. To assess the agility of BMI during specific market entry situations, this paper uses a method that stress tests the value proposition and the components of a BM against contingent uncertainties. We present three qualitative case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous business model renewal [7] and continuous business model 'stress testing' [23] are considered as important elements of leadership processes related to enabling enterprise agility. In addition to continuous evaluation of risks and uncertainties related to the business model, Bowman et al [23], Doz et al [7] and Teece et al [6] have addressed the leadership role in conjunction with business model innovation and ability to continuously evaluate opportunistically alternatives related to elements of a business model [24]. Table 1 summarises their viewpoints on dimensions of agile capabilities and leadership activities for enabling enterprise agility.…”
Section: Defining Enterprise Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Continuous business model renewal [7] and continuous business model 'stress testing' [23] are considered as important elements of leadership processes related to enabling enterprise agility. In addition to continuous evaluation of risks and uncertainties related to the business model, Bowman et al [23], Doz et al [7] and Teece et al [6] have addressed the leadership role in conjunction with business model innovation and ability to continuously evaluate opportunistically alternatives related to elements of a business model [24]. Table 1 summarises their viewpoints on dimensions of agile capabilities and leadership activities for enabling enterprise agility.…”
Section: Defining Enterprise Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business-Driven Approach (Strategic Orientation Towards Agility). The businessdriven approach takes a business level viewpoint such as business model stress testing [23] and continuous business model renewal [7,32]. This could mean for example strategic orientation towards leveraging state-of-the-art digital services and architectures for doing business and/or continuously evaluating alternative revenue streams and channels for deploying customer value.…”
Section: Summary Of Approaches For Achieving Enterprise Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business model research in Electronic Markets dates back to the seminal paper in issue 8/2 (Timmers 1998) and has seen two dedicated special issues and many articles on the topic since. The present contribution adds a new aspect, which focusses on BAchieving agility using business model stress testing^and was authored by Harry Bouwman, Jukka Heikkilä, Marikka Heikkilä and Carlo Leopold (Bouwman et al 2018). Contrary to existing research, which discussed various forms (Btypologies^) and elements (Bbuilding blocks^) of business models as well as methodologies for designing business models (Alt and Zimmermann 2014a, 233), this article conceives business models themselves as objects of change.…”
Section: Articles Of Present Issuementioning
confidence: 95%
“…El enfoque del aprendizaje (14,3%) introduce el tema de la estrategia como práctica (Stefanovic y Milosevic, 2012) y el rol simbólico de los BM (Hacklin y Wallnöfer, 2012). El enfoque prescriptivo (9,5%), enfatiza en las opciones tácticas (Haubro et al, 2015) y las técnicas y herramientas estratégicas para la evaluación de los negocios (Bouwman et al, 2018). El enfoque integrador (9,5%), aborda la gestión de los BM y las transformaciones estructurales (Tallman et al, 2018;Brea-Solis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Panorama Y Futuras Líneas De Trabajounclassified