2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving 1 ppm field homogeneity above 24 T: Application of differential mapping for shimming Keck and the Series Connected Hybrid magnets at the NHMFL

Abstract: Powered resistive and resistive-superconductive hybrid magnets can reach fields higher than superconducting NMR magnets but lack the field homogeneity and temporal stability needed for high resolution NMR. Due to field fluctuations in powered magnets, commercially available mapping systems fail to produce maps of these magnets with sufficient reproducibility, thus hampering attempts to improve homogeneity of the field they generate. Starting with a commercial mapper, we built a mapping system which uses a two-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first-step design requirements for HTS Z1 and Z2 shim coils, for 1.3G and Micro-1G, are: (1) maximum strength of ~ 200 kHz/cm n , where n = 1 for Z1 and n = 2 for Z2; (2) uniformity of < 1% high-order harmonic errors in 1-cm DSV, i.e., for Z1 of 100 ppm shim strength, < 1 ppm errors in higher odd harmonics: Z3, Z5, … and for Z2, those in higher even harmonics: Z4, Z6, …; (3) minimum B0 field that adds to the main field; (4) minimum inductive coupling with the main magnets; and (5) no overlapping coils to minimize a radial build, i.e., both Z1 and Z2 shim coils to be wound on the same layer. To achieve the ultimate field homogeneity goal for our UHF NMR magnets, 1.3G and Mircro-1G, we will first minimize SCF-induced error fields by our proposed Z1 and Z2 HTS inner shim coils, then apply ferromagnetic shims, which are widely used in conventional LTS NMR 13 , 14 , HTS NMR 4 , 5 , 15 , 16 and other UHF NMR magnets 17 , 18 , and finally rely on room-temperature (RT) copper shim coils 19 , 20 for fine tuning.
Figure 1 MIT 1.3-GHz HTS/LTS NMR magnet (left) and 1-GHz REBCO microcoil NMR magnet (right) with REBCO Z1, Z2 shim coils.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first-step design requirements for HTS Z1 and Z2 shim coils, for 1.3G and Micro-1G, are: (1) maximum strength of ~ 200 kHz/cm n , where n = 1 for Z1 and n = 2 for Z2; (2) uniformity of < 1% high-order harmonic errors in 1-cm DSV, i.e., for Z1 of 100 ppm shim strength, < 1 ppm errors in higher odd harmonics: Z3, Z5, … and for Z2, those in higher even harmonics: Z4, Z6, …; (3) minimum B0 field that adds to the main field; (4) minimum inductive coupling with the main magnets; and (5) no overlapping coils to minimize a radial build, i.e., both Z1 and Z2 shim coils to be wound on the same layer. To achieve the ultimate field homogeneity goal for our UHF NMR magnets, 1.3G and Mircro-1G, we will first minimize SCF-induced error fields by our proposed Z1 and Z2 HTS inner shim coils, then apply ferromagnetic shims, which are widely used in conventional LTS NMR 13 , 14 , HTS NMR 4 , 5 , 15 , 16 and other UHF NMR magnets 17 , 18 , and finally rely on room-temperature (RT) copper shim coils 19 , 20 for fine tuning.
Figure 1 MIT 1.3-GHz HTS/LTS NMR magnet (left) and 1-GHz REBCO microcoil NMR magnet (right) with REBCO Z1, Z2 shim coils.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…goal for our UHF NMR magnets, 1.3G and Mircro-1G, we will first minimize SCF-induced error fields by our proposed Z1 and Z2 HTS inner shim coils, then apply ferromagnetic shims, which are widely used in conventional LTS NMR 13,14 , HTS NMR 4,5,15,16 and other UHF NMR magnets 17,18 , and finally rely on room-temperature (RT) copper shim coils 19,20 for fine tuning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%