2015
DOI: 10.21891/jeseh.07449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievement Levels of Middle School Students in the Standardized Science and Technology Exam and Formative Assessment Probes: A Comparative Study

Abstract: This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two qualitative studies (Van der Nest, Long, and Engelbrecht 2018; Beesley et al 2018) focused on teachers' professional development while three studies (Brink and Bartz 2017;Cisterna and Gotwals 2018;Lyon, Oláh, and Wylie 2019) focused on the implementation of formative assessment. Other non-experimental but quantitative studies also focused on the implementation and use of formative assessment (Bulunuz et al 2015;Saito and Inoi 2017;Choi, Kim, and Pak 2018;Xiao and Yang 2019). Although this study aimed to find out how specific strategies of formative assessment have been applied in research, twenty-one studies did not focus on a single strategy but focused on formative assessment as a whole.…”
Section: Five Strategies Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two qualitative studies (Van der Nest, Long, and Engelbrecht 2018; Beesley et al 2018) focused on teachers' professional development while three studies (Brink and Bartz 2017;Cisterna and Gotwals 2018;Lyon, Oláh, and Wylie 2019) focused on the implementation of formative assessment. Other non-experimental but quantitative studies also focused on the implementation and use of formative assessment (Bulunuz et al 2015;Saito and Inoi 2017;Choi, Kim, and Pak 2018;Xiao and Yang 2019). Although this study aimed to find out how specific strategies of formative assessment have been applied in research, twenty-one studies did not focus on a single strategy but focused on formative assessment as a whole.…”
Section: Five Strategies Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two qualitative studies (Van der Nest et al, 2018;Beesley et al, 2018) focused on teachers' professional development while three studies (Brink & Bartz, 2017;Cisterna & Gotwals, 2018;Lyon et al, 2019) focused on the implementation of formative assessment. Other non-experimental but quantitative studies also focused on the implementation and use of formative assessment (Bulunuz et al, 2016;Saito & Inoi, 2017;Choi et al, 2018;Xiao & Yang, 2019). Although this review of literature aimed to find out how specific strategies of formative assessment were applied in research, 21 studies focused on formative assessment as a whole.…”
Section: All the Five Strategies Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%