ACHIEVE Model on Research and Publication Performance

Abstract

Objective - The number of publications written by Indonesian lecturers and researchers has increased both in terms of quantity and quality. However, it is still lower than some neighboring countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. Hence, academics in Indonesia, especially in West Kalimantan, still need to improve their research and publication performance. This research aims to analyze the effect of the ACHIEVE model which stands for Ability, Clarity, Help, Incentive, Evaluation, Validity, and Environment, on research and publication performance. Methodology/Technique – The research questions that must be answered in this research was whether Ability, Clarity, Help, Incentive, Evaluation, Validity, and Environment significantly influenced the performance of lecturers' research and publications. The data were collected by distributing self-report questionnaires to 100 lecturers. Finding - The data were also supported by a secondary source taken from the literature study. Measurement variables were developed from the theory and results of previous studies. The data, then, were analyzed by using multiple linear regression with SPSS software. The novelty in this article is the use of the Achieve model to study research and publication performance in higher education institution. Novelty - This research suggested that Ability, Clarity, Help, Incentive, Evaluation, Validity and Environment had a significant effect on research performance. The research also found that the Ability had the highest effect on the research performance. Type of Paper: Empirical. Keywords: Performance, ACHIEVE, Ability, Clarity, Incentive, Performance. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Sulistiowati; Komari, N. 2020. ACHIEVE Model on Research and Publication Performance, Global J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Review, 8(1): 22 – 29. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2020.8.1(3) JEL Classification: M12, M19.

Does Entrepreneurship Make You Happier? A Comparative Analysis between Entrepreneurs and Wage Earners

“…Nor is there one among permanent employees. There is a statistically significant difference between men and women who are temporary employees: women report being the happiest (although the Spearman correlation is very low, 8%) [78]. There are also statistically significant differences between men and women in category 4, employers without employees; in this case, men (average 7.59) seem to be happier than women (average 7.23), with a Spearman correlation of 10.3% (Table 5) [79].…”