2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00207-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate stress intensity factor solutions for corner cracks at a hole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 in the same form as presented in Ref. 5, where the parameter ܳ is the shape factor for an ellipse, defined as 11 It is seen that the model presented in this paper is in very good agreement with the Fawaz-Andersson model for the considered configuration. The current model is able to calculate the stress intensity factor along the entire crack front, including the peaks close to the free surfaces, and was able to determine the effect of the two considered r/W values.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Solutionssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 in the same form as presented in Ref. 5, where the parameter ܳ is the shape factor for an ellipse, defined as 11 It is seen that the model presented in this paper is in very good agreement with the Fawaz-Andersson model for the considered configuration. The current model is able to calculate the stress intensity factor along the entire crack front, including the peaks close to the free surfaces, and was able to determine the effect of the two considered r/W values.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Solutionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For instance, the developed model was validated in part with results from Fawaz and Andersson (F-A), which have themselves been compared with results from a previous Round-Robin study problem of symmetric corner cracks at a hole. 5 The Round-Robin study included results from seven different calculation methods and analysis software. 11 To model symmetric cracks, half of the current model was deleted and symmetry boundary conditions were applied to the created face.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions for two symmetrical CCs were modified by a conversion factor developed by Shah, 9 based on area reduction, to estimate the SIF for a single CC at the hole. More recently Fawaz and Andersson 10 have reported an extensive database of SIF solutions generated using an hp‐version FE method. All of these solutions are limited to remote loading conditions such as uniform tension, in‐plane bending or pin loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 with the results predicted by NASGRO and by AFGROW, 14 a public domain fracture mechanic software for Damage Tolerance analysis developed by the U.S. Air Force. This software contains a recent and accurate solution for the stress intensity factor of a corner crack in a pin‐loaded hole 15 . Results obtained show that a crack propagates very slowly compared with predictions, particularly in the thickness direction; AFGROW predicts better the surface dimension of the crack, but in any case the result is very conservative.…”
Section: Wing To Fuselage Connection Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%