2008
DOI: 10.1149/1.2836739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate SIMS Doping Profiling of Aluminum-Doped Solid-Phase Epitaxy Silicon Islands

Abstract: A procedure has been implemented for a quantitative aluminum-doping profiling of m-scale aluminum-induced solid-phaseepitaxy ͑SPE͒ Si islands formed at 400°C. The aluminum concentration was measured to be 1-2 ϫ 10 19 cm −3 , which is about 10 times higher than previously reported electrical activation levels. The elemental concentration was measured by secondary-ionmass-spectroscopy ͑SIMS͒ on arrays of SPE Si islands grown by a recently developed process that allows control of the island geometry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low resistivity measured suggests an Al impurity concentration of ∼1 × 10 19 cm −3 (7 × 10 18 to 2 × 10 19 cm −3 ) extracted from a bulk p-type single crystal silicon curve, which is higher than the value of 5−6 × 10 18 cm −3 that is extrapolated from a solubility diagram for Al in Si at 550 °C . While more detailed study is underway to determine the actual Al concentration and distribution, Al incorporation above the solubility limit is possible, as Al concentrations ranging from 3 × 10 19 to 10 20 cm −3 have been reported for aluminum induced crystallization of silicon at 375−525 °C. Nevertheless, the measured resistivity here is much lower than the values of 10 4 −10 5 Ω-cm obtained for nominally undoped Au catalyzed Si NWs grown in our reactor . The I − V curves obtained from a four-point measurement (Figure c) and a three-point measurement providing the resistance of the gap and one contact (Figure d) are both linear and differ by only an additional contact resistance of about 150 Ω.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The low resistivity measured suggests an Al impurity concentration of ∼1 × 10 19 cm −3 (7 × 10 18 to 2 × 10 19 cm −3 ) extracted from a bulk p-type single crystal silicon curve, which is higher than the value of 5−6 × 10 18 cm −3 that is extrapolated from a solubility diagram for Al in Si at 550 °C . While more detailed study is underway to determine the actual Al concentration and distribution, Al incorporation above the solubility limit is possible, as Al concentrations ranging from 3 × 10 19 to 10 20 cm −3 have been reported for aluminum induced crystallization of silicon at 375−525 °C. Nevertheless, the measured resistivity here is much lower than the values of 10 4 −10 5 Ω-cm obtained for nominally undoped Au catalyzed Si NWs grown in our reactor . The I − V curves obtained from a four-point measurement (Figure c) and a three-point measurement providing the resistance of the gap and one contact (Figure d) are both linear and differ by only an additional contact resistance of about 150 Ω.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On both patterned and nonpatterned crystalline Si substrates this process produced high-quality monocrystalline Si (c-Si) islands, which are uniformly doped with Al. 10 Focus was placed on the use of these p + SPE-Si islands for the fabrication of devices containing p + -n diodes and p + contacts. Device quality was found to be exceptionally good for a large range of device geometries and process parameters, including temperatures down to 400°C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention here that first-principles calculations demonstrated that substitutional Al is the most energetically favorable configuration of Al-related defects in a Si lattice [24,25]. Nevertheless, several previous studies demonstrated that the measured Al concentrations (∼1×10 17 -2×10 21 atom cm −3 ) are significantly greater than the measured Al dopant concentrations (∼10 12 -10 19 atom cm −3 ) [19][20][21][22][23], which indicates that not all Al atoms are electrically active and hence they may possibly form other inactive complexes in a Si lattice. For instance, the Al substitutional-self-interstitial (Al Si -Si i ) complex is electrically inactive [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, unlike other dopants, Al incorporation in Si is often associated with very poor electrical activity [7][8][9][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. It is important to mention here that first-principles calculations demonstrated that substitutional Al is the most energetically favorable configuration of Al-related defects in a Si lattice [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%