2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Mapping and Planning for Autonomous Racing

Abstract: This paper presents the perception, mapping, and planning pipeline implemented on an autonomous race car. It was developed by the 2019 AMZ driverless team for the Formula Student Germany (FSG) 2019 driverless competition, where it won 1st place overall. The presented solution combines early fusion of camera and LiDAR data, a layered mapping approach, and a planning approach that uses Bayesian filtering to achieve high-speed driving on unknown race tracks while creating accurate maps. We benchmark the method ag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to other methods of finding the optimal trajectory, the ANN is capable of predicting the racing line with equivalent or better accuracy than other traditional methods -the difference between the line predicted by the ANN and the OCP method compares favourably to the differences between Siegler et al From the perspective of AV control, the ANN's prediction accuracy is similar to Andresen et al (2020)'s accuracy of map generation in an autonomous racing vehicle at racing speed (±0.39m vs ±0.29m RMSE respectively). The accuracy is qualitatively similar to that achievable by a path-following driver model following a racing line at speed in an autonomous racing car (Culley et al, 2020;Kapania, 2016), and a road-going vehicle in Wang et al (2016).…”
Section: Prediction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In comparison to other methods of finding the optimal trajectory, the ANN is capable of predicting the racing line with equivalent or better accuracy than other traditional methods -the difference between the line predicted by the ANN and the OCP method compares favourably to the differences between Siegler et al From the perspective of AV control, the ANN's prediction accuracy is similar to Andresen et al (2020)'s accuracy of map generation in an autonomous racing vehicle at racing speed (±0.39m vs ±0.29m RMSE respectively). The accuracy is qualitatively similar to that achievable by a path-following driver model following a racing line at speed in an autonomous racing car (Culley et al, 2020;Kapania, 2016), and a road-going vehicle in Wang et al (2016).…”
Section: Prediction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the field of perception, researchers use the unique environment of the race track to demonstrate large-scale mapping with fewer features (Nobis et al, 2019) as well as localization at high speeds (Renzler et al, 2020;Schratter et al, 2021). Since the Formula Student Driverless (FSD) competition requires the teams to drive and localize at the same time, the teams present Graph-SLAM (Andresen et al, 2020;Large et al, 2021) and Recurrent Neural Network-based methods (Srinivasan et al, 2020) for localization and state estimation of the FSD vehicle. In addition, the FSD competition provides yellow and blue cones as the race track and the teams need to detect those cones at high vehicle speeds.…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…pilatus is equipped with a complete sensor suite including two LiDARs, three cameras, an absolute speed sensor and two IMUs. The low-level as well as the state estimation are deployed on an ETAS ES900 real-time embedded system; the remainder of the Autonomous System (AS), including mapping and localization, runs on an Intel Xeon E3 processor, see [11], [29]- [32] for more details.…”
Section: A Pilatus Driverlessmentioning
confidence: 99%