2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2019.8741718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Ground Impact Footprints and Probabilistic Maps for Risk Analysis of UAV Missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To fully understand the parametric considerations of the ground impact probability maps and the dynamic assumptions made on the descent model, it is worth briefly recalling the map generation pipeline previously developed by the authors in [9]. The failure case considered is a total loss of control due to a power failure.…”
Section: A Stochastic Generation Of Impact Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To fully understand the parametric considerations of the ground impact probability maps and the dynamic assumptions made on the descent model, it is worth briefly recalling the map generation pipeline previously developed by the authors in [9]. The failure case considered is a total loss of control due to a power failure.…”
Section: A Stochastic Generation Of Impact Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these parameters, we then obtain the associated state vector χ 0 and control vector u 0 . Real flight trajectories of an UAV performing cruise-like flight mode in straight line and constant altitude with respect to the ground were used to estimate the dispersion of the parameters R 0 , γ 0 (see [9]). The distribution of this data is approximated by a Gaussian distribution and is used to sample the values R 0 , γ 0 .…”
Section: A Stochastic Generation Of Impact Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This area is defined by assuming a gliding descent to the ground and is therefore parametrized by the gliding range of the vehicle. Note that improved models can be used instead for this definition, such as the ones developed in [11]. The third term, Pr{collision|impact∩loss}, takes into account the surface of collision between the UAV and someone as well as the population density at ground.…”
Section: Pr{casualty}=pr{loss}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAVs in urban areas may fall and hit people and vehicles on the ground [6][7]. UAVs may also intrude into airport airspaces [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%