2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and efficient modeling of global seismic wave propagation for an attenuative Earth model including the center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the second-order central differencing method, the MHD_Spectral code is computed by a hybrid Fourier spectral [16,17], and the MHD_FDM code is computed by the 12th order accurate finite difference method [18]. QSFDM_GLOBE This code simulates global seismic wave fields generated by a moment-tensor point source [19]. It solves a 3D wave equation in spherical coordinates on a 2D structural cross section, assuming that the structure is rotationally symmetric about the vertical axis including the source, so called axisymmetric 2.5D modeling.…”
Section: Bcm (Building-cube Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the second-order central differencing method, the MHD_Spectral code is computed by a hybrid Fourier spectral [16,17], and the MHD_FDM code is computed by the 12th order accurate finite difference method [18]. QSFDM_GLOBE This code simulates global seismic wave fields generated by a moment-tensor point source [19]. It solves a 3D wave equation in spherical coordinates on a 2D structural cross section, assuming that the structure is rotationally symmetric about the vertical axis including the source, so called axisymmetric 2.5D modeling.…”
Section: Bcm (Building-cube Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a spherical polar coordinate system (r, θ, φ) (Fig. 2), the velocity-stress form of the 3-D isotropic linear elastodynamic equation may be written as (e.g., Igel et al 2002;Toyokuni et al 2012):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8), (9) and (7) (hereafter called "quasi-Cartesian FDTD"), while those for the flat model are obtained by using the equations without the additional terms and assuming constant Δx and Δy (hereafter called "Cartesian FDTD"). In the first numerical example, we check the accuracy and validity of the quasi-Cartesian scheme by comparing the synthetic seismograms with those obtained by the spherical FDTD (Toyokuni and Takenaka 2012) which treats an axisymmetric global model including the center of the sphere in (11) = arctan sin δ sin ε + cos δ sin α cos ε cos δ cos α , β = arcsin(sin δ cos ε − cos δ sin α sin ε).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axisymmetric finite difference methods (Toyokuni and Takenaka, 2006;Jahnke et al, 2008) may accommodate this effectively, but suffer various shortcomings such as approxi-mate sources, lack of fluid domains and anisotropy (Jahnke et al, 2008), and high dispersion errors for large propagation distances of interface-sensitive phases such as surface or diffracted waves. However, recent advances include a full moment tensor, attenuation, and the Earth's center (Toyokuni and Takenaka, 2012).…”
Section: -D Waves In Axisymmetric Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%