2020
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9030395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and Consistent Image-to-Image Conditional Adversarial Network

Abstract: Image-to-image translation based on deep learning has attracted interest in the robotics and vision community because of its potential impact on terrain analysis and image representation, interpretation, modification, and enhancement. Currently, the most successful approach for generating a translated image is a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) for training an autoencoder with skip connections. Despite its impressive performance, it has low accuracy and a lack of consistency; further, its trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding ground truth depth maps are shown in the second column. A comparative analysis is performed in terms of the absolute difference between the ground truth and generated depth maps for the proposed and CITN [28] approaches shown in the fourth column. The last column highlights the erroneous regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding ground truth depth maps are shown in the second column. A comparative analysis is performed in terms of the absolute difference between the ground truth and generated depth maps for the proposed and CITN [28] approaches shown in the fourth column. The last column highlights the erroneous regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sufficient level of generality. We perform a comparative analysis of the proposed approach with the cGAN-based approach [31], BA-DualAE [29], CITN [28], MSDN [13], and FCN [36], respectively, in terms of three different datasets including the RealSense depth dataset [37], Cityscapes [15], and NYU dataset [16]. The comparative analysis for these three datasets using the above-mentioned approaches are given in the following Sections A, B, and C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations