2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of wind farm visualisations: The effect of focal length on perceived accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As wave height is a dynamic value that may vary in a significant way for every wind turbine inside each farm, depending on several different factors, the paper is focused on the other main conditioners: the depth of the seabed and the distance from the coast. The development of new technologies and manufacturing and construction procedures [52], together with the increase in the size of wind farms and turbines and the increase in society's awareness of visual and environmental impacts [53,54], has led to the displacement of these installations further from the coastline, as it can be seen in Figure 2 (the size of the bubbles represents the capacity installed). Other factors to consider are the typology of the stratum of the seabed on which engineers support the foundations [50], possible impacts to shipping routes or other offshore installations, and sea climate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As wave height is a dynamic value that may vary in a significant way for every wind turbine inside each farm, depending on several different factors, the paper is focused on the other main conditioners: the depth of the seabed and the distance from the coast. The development of new technologies and manufacturing and construction procedures [52], together with the increase in the size of wind farms and turbines and the increase in society's awareness of visual and environmental impacts [53,54], has led to the displacement of these installations further from the coastline, as it can be seen in Figure 2 (the size of the bubbles represents the capacity installed). Other factors to consider are the typology of the stratum of the seabed on which engineers support the foundations [50], possible impacts to shipping routes or other offshore installations, and sea climate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation is the wrong measure of whether a change in a view is significant-Cohen's d is more appropriate [40,44]. There is recent research that indicates that photographs systematically underestimate visual impacts as judged in the field [45,46]. In addition, we need to determine the most valid way to present simulations.…”
Section: Test the Validity Of Via Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were included in questionnaires, and respondents were asked to evaluate the aesthetic value of the landscapes. Takacs and Goulden (2019) used photomontage to add turbines on a photograph of a landscape for VIA and noticed that camera lens focal length affects the perception of the scale of wind turbines; results show that panoramic photomontages are perceived as the least accurate, whereas images taken at 75 mm focal length in full-frame format are perceived as the most accurate form of representation of the scale and visual impact of wind turbines focal length. Maslov et al (2017) developed a methodology to assess the degree of visibility of an offshore wind farm from an observer located along the coast; an index of horizon occupation was determined by considering the projection of several distinguishable turbines (installed in Saint-Nazaire in Northwest France) on a plane perpendicular to the sight direction.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Visual Impact Of The Blue Energy Planmentioning
confidence: 99%