2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Virtually Planned and Template Guided Implant Surgery on Edentate Patients

Abstract: The hypothesis was rejected, as the statistical results indicated that there were significant differences between virtually planned implants' position and the final position of implants placed clinically.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
116
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
116
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of deviation between the planned and placed implant position 1,3,8,11 and the possible occurrence of unexpected events or complications, remains substantial 3,5,8,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of deviation between the planned and placed implant position 1,3,8,11 and the possible occurrence of unexpected events or complications, remains substantial 3,5,8,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also add some bias into the accuracy measurements, as factors such as scan appliance positioning after the surgery, patient movement during CBCT exposure, or factors related to software file merging could play a role 29, 31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To transfer this 3D implant planning to the operating room, a surgical template that is generated based on the patient's prosthesis and the planned position of the implants can be used [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This surgical template contains tubes to guide the surgeon to the planned location of the implants (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%