2015
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Two Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTS) for Initial Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring in a High Transmission Setting in Uganda

Abstract: Abstract. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may improve fever management in areas without microscopy. We compared the accuracy of histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDTs, using expert microscopy as a gold standard, for initial diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and diagnosis of recurrent malaria in a cohort of children followed longitudinally in a high-transmission area in Uganda. For 305 initial fever episodes, sensitivity was 98% for HRP2 and 87% for pLDH, whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While other studies have reported ranges of HRP2 specificity from 55% to 88% at high-transmission sites in Uganda (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), our results suggest that the specificity may be even lower than previously described. The most likely explanation for these findings is the persistence of HRP2 antigenemia following treatment of an acute infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While other studies have reported ranges of HRP2 specificity from 55% to 88% at high-transmission sites in Uganda (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), our results suggest that the specificity may be even lower than previously described. The most likely explanation for these findings is the persistence of HRP2 antigenemia following treatment of an acute infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…A recent study from southwestern Uganda demonstrated that the median time to a negative HRP2 RDT after treatment was between 35 and 42 days, with more than a quarter of individuals remaining positive at the end of the 6-week study period (21). Another study from eastern Uganda reported HRP2 persistence in approximately half of cases 1 month after treatment (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RDTs are increasingly being used independently or in combination to microscopy in surveys [ 8 ]. RDTs are attractive as diagnostic tools due to their higher sensitivity compared to microscopy, ease of use and rapid availability of results [ 14 , 26 ]. However, specificity of RDTs and parasite prevalence estimates were highly variable in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional considerations include high rates of false positivity with certain formulations (i.e. histidine‐rich protein 2‐based RDTs), and a requirement for blood smears to confirm negative test results . While molecular testing is highly sensitive and specific, the required infrastructure and technical expertise preclude widespread implementation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%