Estimating malaria parasite prevalence from community surveys in Uganda: a comparison of microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests and polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

BackgroundHousehold surveys are important tools for monitoring the malaria disease burden and measuring impact of malaria control interventions with parasite prevalence as the primary metric. However, estimates of parasite prevalence are dependent on a number of factors including the method used to detect parasites, age of the population sampled, and level of immunity. To better understand the influence of diagnostics, age, and endemicity on estimates of parasite prevalence and how these change over time, community-based surveys were performed for two consecutive years in three settings and the sensitivities of microscopy and immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were assessed, considering polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard.MethodsSurveys were conducted over the same two-month period in 2012 and 2013 in each of three sub-counties in Uganda: Nagongera in Tororo District (January–February), Walukuba in Jinja District (March–April), and Kihihi in Kanungu District (May–June). In each sub-county, 200 households were randomly enrolled and a household questionnaire capturing information on demographics, use of malaria prevention methods, and proxy indicators of wealth was administered to the head of the household. Finger-prick blood samples were obtained for RDTs, measurement of hemoglobin, thick and thin blood smears, and to store samples on filter paper.ResultsA total of 1200 households were surveyed and 4433 participants were included in the analysis. Compared to PCR, the sensitivity of microscopy was low (65.3 % in Nagongera, 49.6 % in Walukuba and 40.9 % in Kihihi) and decreased with increasing age. The specificity of microscopy was over 98 % at all sites and did not vary with age or year. Relative differences in parasite prevalence across different age groups, study sites, and years were similar for microscopy and PCR. The sensitivity of RDTs was similar across the three sites (range 77.2–82.8 %), was consistently higher than microscopy (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), and decreased with increasing age. The specificity of RDTs was lower than microscopy (76.3 % in Nagongera, 86.3 % in Walukuba, and 83.5 % in Kihihi) and varied significantly by year and age. Relative differences in parasite prevalence across age groups and study years differed for RDTs compared to microscopy and PCR.ConclusionMalaria prevalence estimates varied with diagnostic test, age, and transmission intensity. It is important to consider the effects of these parameters when designing and interpreting community-based surveys.

Seroprevalence of Antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoite Antigens as Predictive Disease Transmission Markers in an Area of Ghana with Seasonal Malaria Transmission

“…While this generally reflects the higher preponderance of vectors and hence the extent of disease transmission during the rainy season, the observed high parasite prevalence in the 6–15 year old group suggests a greater exposure of this age group to parasites. Similar findings of high parasite prevalence in this age group have been observed and reported elsewhere [33–36]. …”

Plasmodium falciparumandPlasmodium vivaxPrevalence in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…Currently, several types of malaria diagnostic tests are available including; microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Although microscopy has limited sensitivity and needs skilled professionals, it remains the gold standard for malaria diagnosis [16].…”

The hide and seek of Plasmodium vivax in West Africa: report from a large-scale study in Beninese asymptomatic subjects

“…Serologic assays constitute a good alternative for epidemiological survey and blood donor screening, given that, antibodies reflect exposure to pathogens [17]. ELISA assays were recently developed for the detection of anti- P. falciparum, P. ovale wallikeri/curtisi, and P. malariae antibodies by using species-specific recombinant MSP1 proteins [18].…”