2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of tree stem circumference estimation using close range photogrammetry: Does point-based stem disk thickness matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fits the trend identified in the literature review, where DBH was also the most commonly used measurement used to validate sensor performance when capturing structural forest attributes (n = 19, 86.4%). In some studies that used single-stem capture approaches, mea-surements of DBH were supplemented or replaced with PBH [39,[57][58][59]. The rationale behind this choice is that stem perimeter measurements better accommodate for irregularities across the surface of the stem and thus give a better estimation of stem size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fits the trend identified in the literature review, where DBH was also the most commonly used measurement used to validate sensor performance when capturing structural forest attributes (n = 19, 86.4%). In some studies that used single-stem capture approaches, mea-surements of DBH were supplemented or replaced with PBH [39,[57][58][59]. The rationale behind this choice is that stem perimeter measurements better accommodate for irregularities across the surface of the stem and thus give a better estimation of stem size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBH was used as a measurement in six of the individual stem CRP publications (Table 2), with root mean square error (RMSE) values ranging between 0.37 cm and 1.71 cm when compared to measurements acquired with manual tools. PBH was used as an alternative to DBH in two of the identified publications [39,57], and used alongside DBH in another two [58,59]. PBH measurements derived from SfM had a reported RMSE between 0.25 cm and 1.87 cm when compared to manual measurements.…”
Section: Terrestrial Close Range Photogrammetry Literature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that there are a few related studies on modeling point clouds from tree images based on the QSM method [28]. Both the LiDAR point clouds and the photogrammetry point clouds are composed of a series of coordinate points, and the point clouds contain data in three directions: X axis, Y axis, and Z axis [44,45]. We used AdQSM to reconstruct TP point clouds.…”
Section: Forest Inventory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the commercial software Pix4D mapper 4.5.2 (Pix4D company, Prilly, Switzerland, www.pix4d.com (accessed on 30 July 2021)) was used to automatically realize the SfM process in 30 min, which generated a 3D point cloud of the plot from the disordered 2D photo by searching for feature points. In the photo-matching process, the Scale Invariable Feature Transformation (SIFT) algorithm matched data based on the feature points between the stereo pairs [28,44]. The model is optimized by bundle block adjustment and nonlinear least squares algorithm [46].…”
Section: D Point Cloud Generation Based On Photosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies that evaluated CRP generally assessed its accuracy in extracting geometrical measurements. For instance, in the area of forestry, several studies [23][24][25][26] evaluated the accuracy of CRP in estimating tree attributes (e.g., tree radius, circumference, and height) extracted from point clouds generated from digital compact camera images. Similarly, in the area of engineering, some studies assessed CRP according to its accuracy in estimating models' volumes [22,27,28] and deformation monitoring [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%