2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the glenohumeral subluxation index in nonpathologic shoulders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, correlation coefficients were not high, as is often found during comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements. 31 This discrepancy could be attributed to differences in orientation; the computed anatomical landmarks were not positioned in the exact same plane as 2-dimensional measurements, which are obtained 1 cm parallel to the tibiotalar joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, correlation coefficients were not high, as is often found during comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements. 31 This discrepancy could be attributed to differences in orientation; the computed anatomical landmarks were not positioned in the exact same plane as 2-dimensional measurements, which are obtained 1 cm parallel to the tibiotalar joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During preprocessing, left scapulae were mirrored to a right and all 3D surfaces were aligned to a glenoid-based coordinate system (3-matic; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) (Figure 1). 20 To focus the analysis on the periarticular anatomy of the scapula and concentrate placement of correspondence points on the region of interest, a cutting plane was defined through the scapular notch parallel to the best-fit circle of the inferior glenoid. A total of 2048 correspondence points were hierarchically placed on the region of interest and used to generate the mean shape of both groups.…”
Section: Statistical Shape Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrier et al reported that two-dimensional measures of retroversion underestimate three-dimensional measures by about 3° [47]. Jacxsens et al compared humeral subluxation on two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging and determined that two-dimensional measurements underestimated posterior subluxation compared to three-dimensional measures by about 3 % [48]. Understanding these differences will be necessary when utilizing historical two-dimensional measurement data to guide planning using three-dimensional measurements.…”
Section: Computer Planning For Shoulder Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%