2019
DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.18101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Detection of Bone Invasion in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is more consistent with robust systematic reviews assessing CT imaging of bony invasion in SCC of the oral cavity, for example in Bombeccari et al where CT is reported to have a LRþ of 14.8 and LRÀ of 0.4. 27 It is unclear why our findings differ so drastically from Kadakia et al's, but their study included only immunocompromised patients, with an average age 11.7 years younger than our cohort (63.2 years compared to our 74.9), and had a much more even male:female ratio (29:24, compared to 29:10 in our study). Kadakia et al also did not investigate CT scan accuracy as a primary aim.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is more consistent with robust systematic reviews assessing CT imaging of bony invasion in SCC of the oral cavity, for example in Bombeccari et al where CT is reported to have a LRþ of 14.8 and LRÀ of 0.4. 27 It is unclear why our findings differ so drastically from Kadakia et al's, but their study included only immunocompromised patients, with an average age 11.7 years younger than our cohort (63.2 years compared to our 74.9), and had a much more even male:female ratio (29:24, compared to 29:10 in our study). Kadakia et al also did not investigate CT scan accuracy as a primary aim.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…where CT is reported to have a LR+ of 14.8 and LR− of 0.4. 27 It is unclear why our findings differ so drastically from Kadakia et al.’s, but their study included only immunocompromised patients, with an average age 11.7 years younger than our cohort (63.2 years compared to our 74.9), and had a much more even male:female ratio (29:24, compared to 29:10 in our study). Kadakia et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Computed tomography (CT) is more valuable in evaluating invasion into bone structures. [14] Immunological agents can be used in the treatment. [15] However, definitive treatment is provided by surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, all methodologies have advantages and disadvantages, however previous studies (Ahmed & Ali, 2019;Barbero & Ureta, 2011;Bombeccari, Candotto, Giannì, Carinci & Spadari 2019;Brüllmann & Schulze, 2015;Damstra et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2010;Panzarella et al, 2011) presented results that might be applied to the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%