1977
DOI: 10.5558/tfc53077-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Regeneration Stocking Estimates: Tests with Simulated Data

Abstract: A computer was used to generate points representing tree seedlings in an area of natural regeneration. These seedlings were than sampled and the per cent stocking calculated for 2 m x 2 m (milacre) plots. A systematic survey design was used, employing a wide variety of plot spacings. Groups of plots were included as well as single plots. For each spacing, repeated surveys were run and a standard error was estimated for the stocking level. Graphs were drawn to show the approximate sampling intensity required to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This clustered design was employed because of the substantially lower sampling time per plot or per distance compared to a design of single plots. A study of simulated seedling populations (MacLeod 1977) suggested that this represented a reasonable compromise between accuracy and sampling time required.…”
Section: Survey Design and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clustered design was employed because of the substantially lower sampling time per plot or per distance compared to a design of single plots. A study of simulated seedling populations (MacLeod 1977) suggested that this represented a reasonable compromise between accuracy and sampling time required.…”
Section: Survey Design and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequential sampling procedure of Dick (1963) is a useful survey method for such situations. In recent years, computers have been used to determine regeneration accuracies for different sampling methodologies (MacLeod 1977) or complex stands (Hassani et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%