2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Predicting the Pharyngeal Airway Space on the Cephalogram After Mandibular Setback Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results were not uniform, with one study finding no significant airway narrowing and two studies describing significant oropharyngeal narrowing after incisor retraction. Of the two studies with significant airway narrowing, one reported an oropharyngeal narrowing of 0.40 mm, well within the error of cephalometric airway measurements …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, results were not uniform, with one study finding no significant airway narrowing and two studies describing significant oropharyngeal narrowing after incisor retraction. Of the two studies with significant airway narrowing, one reported an oropharyngeal narrowing of 0.40 mm, well within the error of cephalometric airway measurements …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…All except one East Asian study reported airway dimensional reduction at the oropharynx and sometimes the hypopharynx as well as inferior and/or posterior movement of the hyoid bone after incisor retraction. However, the stated linear airway narrowing and hyoid bone movements in lateral cephalometric studies were small and comparable to the estimated 1.0 mm to 1.55 mm error of cephalometric airway measurements and the 1.02 mm to 2.16 mm error for hyoid measurements …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The postoperative PAS dimension was calculated from the change of C3-Me using 2 cephalometric radiographs taken before and 1 year after surgery. The equation used was PAS = −21.105 + 0.402 C3-Me (r = 0.854) [20]. In our study, the cervical vertebra showed strong correlation with pharyngeal airway changes at almost all levels and can be the good predictors for PAS.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 48%
“…Therefore, the usage of C3-B as a predictor is visually easy for the surgeon. In a previous study, the prediction equations are somewhat complicated with many predictors except the formula by Muto that used C3-Me as a predictor [20]. Compared to C3-B, C3-Me is less practical, because Me point is not involved in surgical planning.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies examined changes in the pharyngeal airway size utilizing lateral cephalograms which allow two dimensional measurements of a three dimensional object, and measurements are taken in the sagittal or antero-posterior dimension [3,[4][5][6]12]. In order to better understand how the airway is affected, it is important to study the size and shape of the airway in both antero-posterior and lateral direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%