2013
DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e31828a183c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Restaging for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a useful tool for predicting the diagnosis and restaging of suspected recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,12] A recent meta-analysis of 29 studies demonstrated that PET-CT had high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (90%). [13] Some reports have shown that management plans tended to change after examination of PET scans. [14,15] Fulham mentioned that the management plans in 58.9% of patients changed based on PET scan findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,12] A recent meta-analysis of 29 studies demonstrated that PET-CT had high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (90%). [13] Some reports have shown that management plans tended to change after examination of PET scans. [14,15] Fulham mentioned that the management plans in 58.9% of patients changed based on PET scan findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite possible declinations in preoperative assessment of peritoneal metastasis dissemination from the accurate picture, this method gives the opportunity to adequately carry out the selection of patients for surgical treatment. 14,15 Figure 2 CT image of solid oval implant of homogenous structure, 27х16mm in douglas space. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of FDG-PET/CT has been previously described to assess recurrent ETOC patients, in order to exclude extra-abdominal disease and to evaluate retroperitoneal and/or intraparenchymal disease [20,21,22,23]. The accuracy rate of FDG-PET/CT has ranged from 70 to 95%, and it is limited by the inability to detect small volume (<7-10 mm) disease [20,21,22,23]. Thus, diffuse recurrent carcinosis consisting of multiple nodules of a few millimeters could be overlooked by FDG-PET/CT, leading to inappropriate surgical explorations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%