Accuracy of patients' recall of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction after experiencing whiplash trauma

Salé, Hanna; Hedman, Leif; Isberg, Annika

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0287

Cited by 23 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Whiplash has been implicated in the aetiology of TMD (Klobas et al , 2004), but how it may lead to POMP is unclear. Moreover, many studies assess the presence of TMD (includes both POMP and TMJ disorders) (Carroll et al , 2007) or solely assess the TMJ (Sale et al , 2010) making the interperatation of the literature difficult. Dynamic three dimensional modelling shows little evidence to support the contention that there is damage to the masticatory apparatus during whiplash (Perez del Palomar and Doblare, 2008).…”

Section: Pathophysiology Of Pompmentioning

confidence: 99%

Persistent orofacial muscle pain

Benoliel

Svensson

et al. 2011

Oral Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pathophysiology of persistent orofacial myalgia has been the centre of much controversy. In this article we suggest a novel descriptive term; Ôpersistent orofacial muscle pain' (POMP) and review current evidence that supports the hypothesis that the induction of POMP involves the interplay between a peripheral nociceptive source in muscle, a faulty central nervous system component and decreased coping ability. In this context it is widely accepted that a complex interaction of variable intrinsic and extrinsic factors act to induce POMP and dysfunction.

show abstract

Section: Pathophysiology Of Pompmentioning

confidence: 99%

Persistent orofacial muscle pain

Benoliel

Svensson

et al. 2011

Oral Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, most studies used a subjective, self-reported index of treatment effects as the outcome measure. Because participants self-reported without additional objective outcomes, their pain status could not be assessed accurately [ 39 ]. Furthermore, the included studies used different treatments for the intervention group, such as acupuncture, moxibustion, ear acupressure, electroacupuncture and acupoint application, which of the purpose is to highlight the specificity of acupoints.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of acupoint-stimulation for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea compared with NSAIDs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs

Zhao

Te³

et al. 2017

BMC Complement Altern Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD), defined as painful menses in women with normal pelvic anatomy, is one of the most common gynaecological syndromes. Acupoint-stimulation could potentially be an effective intervention for PD. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness of acupoint-stimulation compared with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NASIDs) in the treatment of PD. Methods: Six databases were searched to December 2014. Sixteen studies involving 1679 PD patients were included. We included randomized controlled trials that compared acupoint-stimulation with NASIDs for the treatment of PD. The main outcomes assessed were clinical effectiveness rate, symptom score, visual analogue score, variation in peripheral blood prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) and side effects. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis statistical software.

show abstract

“…Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) produce significant pain and limitation of jaw function, although, characteristically, there is no apparent trauma or pathology to account for the symptoms. Nonetheless, when queried, patients often cite a preexisting injury as a trigger of the symptoms, and retrospective studies report strong associations between history of injury and odds of TMD (Haggman-Henrikson et al 2004; Klobas et al 2004; Visscher et al 2005; Caroll 2007; Grushka et al 2007; Salè et al 2010; Ohrbach et al 2011). In addition to problems of recall bias, those retrospective studies usually inquire only about injuries from obvious trauma (e.g., following a blow to the face), overlooking potential injury from routine jaw function (e.g., prolonged mouth opening).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to problems of recall bias, those retrospective studies usually inquire only about injuries from obvious trauma (e.g., following a blow to the face), overlooking potential injury from routine jaw function (e.g., prolonged mouth opening). Many studies of TMDs have other methodological limitations, including lack of suitable comparison groups (Martin et al 2007; DeAngelis et al 2009; Sahebi et al 2010), use of comparison groups where TMD misclassification is likely (Klobas et al 2004), and nonvalidated methods to diagnose TMD and evaluate injury (Huang et al 2002; Martin et al 2007; Sahebi et al 2010; Salè et al 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain Sensitivity Modifies Risk of Injury-Related Temporomandibular Disorder

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluates contributions of jaw injury and experimental pain sensitivity to risk of developing painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Data were from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) nested case-control study of incident painful TMD. Injury and subsequent onset of painful TMD were monitored prospectively for ≤5 y in a community-based sample of 409 US adults who did not have TMD when enrolled. At baseline, thermal-pressure and pinprick pain sensitivity, as potential effect modifiers, were measured using quantitative sensory testing. During follow-up, jaw injury from any of 9 types of potentially traumatic events was determined using quarterly (3-monthly) health update questionnaires. Study examiners classified incident painful TMD, yielding 233 incident cases and 176 matched controls. Logistic regression models, estimated incidence odds ratios (IORs), and 95% confidence limits (CLs) were used for the association between injury and subsequent onset of painful TMD. During follow-up, 38.2% of incident cases and 13.1% of controls reported 1 or more injuries that were 4 times as likely to be intrinsic (i.e., sustained mouth opening or yawning) as extrinsic (e.g., dental visits, whiplash). Injuries due to extrinsic events (IOR = 7.6; 95% CL, 1.6–36.2), sustained opening (IOR = 5.4; 95% CL, 2.4–12.2), and yawning (IOR = 3.4; 95% CL, 1.6–7.3) were associated with increased TMD incidence. Both a single injury (IOR = 6.0; 95% CL, 2.9–12.4) and multiple injuries (IOR = 9.4; 95% CL, 3.4,25.6) predicted greater incidence of painful TMD than events perceived as noninjurious (IOR = 1.9; 95% CL, 1.1–3.4). Injury-associated risk of painful TMD was elevated in people with high sensitivity to heat pain (IOR = 7.4; 95% CL, 3.1–18.0) compared to people with low sensitivity to heat pain (IOR = 3.9; 95% CL, 1.7–8.4). Jaw injury was strongly associated with elevated painful TMD risk, and the risk was amplified in subjects who had enhanced sensitivity to heat pain at enrollment. Commonly occurring but seemingly innocuous events, such as yawning injury, should not be overlooked when judging prognostic importance of jaw injury.

show abstract

Accuracy of patients' recall of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction after experiencing whiplash trauma

Cited by 23 publications

References 27 publications

Persistent orofacial muscle pain

Persistent orofacial muscle pain

Effects of acupoint-stimulation for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea compared with NSAIDs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs

Pain Sensitivity Modifies Risk of Injury-Related Temporomandibular Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About