2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of New Deep Learning Model-Based Segmentation and Key-Point Multi-Detection Method for Ultrasonographic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Screening

Abstract: Hip joint ultrasonographic (US) imaging is the golden standard for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) screening. However, the effectiveness of this technique is subject to interoperator and intraobserver variability. Thus, a multi-detection deep learning artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was developed and evaluated. The deep learning model used a two-stage training process to segment the four key anatomical structures and extract their respective key points. In addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 2 that the mean α value of the test set is 60.94°, which means that measurement error may lead to misclassification [ 28 ]. While in SM mode, both the classification agreement rate and Cohen’s kappa show high classification performance compared with that of experienced sonographers (classification agreement rate: 82%~91%, Cohen’s kappa: 0.60~0.86) reported by [ 38 ] and better than for other CAD methods [ 28 , 29 , 31 ]. Nevertheless, we still suggest sonographers pay more attention to the potential misclassification situation of hips with α around 60° (58°~62°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen from Table 2 that the mean α value of the test set is 60.94°, which means that measurement error may lead to misclassification [ 28 ]. While in SM mode, both the classification agreement rate and Cohen’s kappa show high classification performance compared with that of experienced sonographers (classification agreement rate: 82%~91%, Cohen’s kappa: 0.60~0.86) reported by [ 38 ] and better than for other CAD methods [ 28 , 29 , 31 ]. Nevertheless, we still suggest sonographers pay more attention to the potential misclassification situation of hips with α around 60° (58°~62°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The above results demonstrate that, in terms of measurement accuracy, the performance of SM mode is better than that of human observers. The MAEs of the α, β angles demonstrate that SM mode also performs better than other deep learning-based methods [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have read the article titled “Accuracy of New Deep Learning Model-Based Segmentation and Key-Point Multi-Detection Method for Ultrasonographic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Screening” by Lee et al with great interest [ 1 ]. This paper focused on the usability of an artificial intelligence (AI)–computer aided detection (CAD) system for screening and diagnosis of DDH, for which the authors used Graf’s method to evaluate the ultrasonographic results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%