2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
339
9
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 495 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
28
339
9
8
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 3). Median sensitivities were modest and specificities were excellent, and similar to a recently published systematic review/meta-analysis 29 (Table 2). …”
Section: Key Evidencesupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2, 3). Median sensitivities were modest and specificities were excellent, and similar to a recently published systematic review/meta-analysis 29 (Table 2). …”
Section: Key Evidencesupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Our systematic review of the literature is consistent with a well-conducted, recently published systematic review/ meta-analysis that reported overall sensitivity of approximately 50-60% and specificity of >85%, despite differences in methodology (e.g., years searched) and analyzed studies (e.g., ER, field strength, mpMRI). 29 In our work, above average sensitivities were achieved in some studies; however, whether this was due to the addition of functional sequences or field strength was not clear owing to too few studies (Table 3). Other reports of sensitivity and specificity of MRI for local staging of prostate cancer range from 15-100% and 67-100%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goal of RP is eradication of PCa, while preserving continence and, whenever possible, [46]. But the experience of the radiologist remains of paramount importance.…”
Section: Radical Prostatectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sole use of a body phased-array coil at 3 T as widely used in practice is justified by the good detection of significant tumors [28]. Use of the combined endorectal body phased-array coil at 3 T can improve local staging, particularly the evaluation of extracapsular growth [35]. When using an endorectal coil, it should be filled with air.…”
Section: Endorectal Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%