1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb05866.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Decreases with Increasing Age

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is common in the elderly and often is diagnosed clinically without pathologic confirmation. We compared age distribution and survival of 240 elderly patients with clinically diagnosed pancreatic cancer and 712 elderly patients with pathologically confirmed adeno- and ductal pancreatic carcinoma. All patients were registered by the Kansas state cancer registry from 1975-1984. The percentage of clinical diagnoses increased significantly from 12% in those aged in their 60s to 59% for those in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ultrasound, computerized tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and fine-needle aspiration). Difficulties in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (Yankaskas et al, 1985;Warshaw and Fernandez-del Castillo, 1992;Niederau and Gren-dell, 1992) and their implications in terms of misclassification biases have been pointed out (Gudjonsson et al, 1978;Lyon et al, 1989;Nieman and Holmes, 1989;Malats et al, 1993;Alanen and Joensuu, 1993). It is certainly reasonable to hypothesize that advances in imaging, biological and cytohistological techniques have furthered the diagnosis and certification of the disease (Yankaskas et al, 1985;Schadt et al, 1991;Arnar et al, 1991;Niederau and Grendell, 1992).…”
Section: This Overview Of Pancreatic Cancer Mortality Trends Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ultrasound, computerized tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and fine-needle aspiration). Difficulties in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (Yankaskas et al, 1985;Warshaw and Fernandez-del Castillo, 1992;Niederau and Gren-dell, 1992) and their implications in terms of misclassification biases have been pointed out (Gudjonsson et al, 1978;Lyon et al, 1989;Nieman and Holmes, 1989;Malats et al, 1993;Alanen and Joensuu, 1993). It is certainly reasonable to hypothesize that advances in imaging, biological and cytohistological techniques have furthered the diagnosis and certification of the disease (Yankaskas et al, 1985;Schadt et al, 1991;Arnar et al, 1991;Niederau and Grendell, 1992).…”
Section: This Overview Of Pancreatic Cancer Mortality Trends Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrimination between a well-differentiated pancreatic carcinoma [3] and chronic fibrotizing pancreatitis is a challenge not only to the radiologist [4] , but also to the pathologist [5,6] . As mentioned above, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis may coexist, and a malignant tumor can develop as a complication of long-standing chronic pancreatitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%