2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Detecting Small Periapical Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
65
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A few recent studies clearly indicate the potential improvement of the diagnosis of periapical lesions by the introduction of CBCT. In a comparison to conventional radiographs, Tsai et al [12] and Liang et al [13] proved a higher sensitivity of CBCT especially for smaller lesions and an overall increase in diagnostic fidelity. Estrela et al [14] reported that only progressed periapical lesions were identified correctly by conventional radiography.…”
Section: Materials Und Methoden: In Die Studie Wurden 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent studies clearly indicate the potential improvement of the diagnosis of periapical lesions by the introduction of CBCT. In a comparison to conventional radiographs, Tsai et al [12] and Liang et al [13] proved a higher sensitivity of CBCT especially for smaller lesions and an overall increase in diagnostic fidelity. Estrela et al [14] reported that only progressed periapical lesions were identified correctly by conventional radiography.…”
Section: Materials Und Methoden: In Die Studie Wurden 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The literature, mainly based on in vitro studies, supports the hypothesis that CBCT is a method with greater accuracy than periapical radiographs in detecting apical periodontitis, resorptions and root fractures. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The effective radiation dose using the state-of-the-art radiologic technique with rectangular collimator and a high-speed film or digital sensor is extremely low. 28 For a CBCT examination to be justified, it needs to be of potential benefit to the patient, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patrick ve ark. 15 CBCT cihazlarının 0,8 mm'den büyük lezyonların tespitinde geleneksel radyografilerden daha iyi sonuçlar verdiğini bildirmişlerdir. 0.8 mm'den küçük lezyonlarda geleneksel radyografiler gibi CBCT cihazlarının da limitasyonlara sahip olduğunu ifade edilmiştir.…”
Section: Apikal Periodontitisin Tespitiunclassified