2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinematics of the femur, tibia, and patella were obtained using rigid body markers and a 3-camera Optotrak 3020 system (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Ontario). This system has a measurement bias of 0.05° and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.67° for a rotation of 10°, and a bias of 0.03 mm and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.29 mm for a translation of 10mm [18]. The position and orientation of each cadaver femur, tibia, and patella relative to the dynamic knee simulator were recorded using a probing tip with the Optotrak system.…”
Section: Cadaver Knee Measurements and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematics of the femur, tibia, and patella were obtained using rigid body markers and a 3-camera Optotrak 3020 system (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Ontario). This system has a measurement bias of 0.05° and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.67° for a rotation of 10°, and a bias of 0.03 mm and a 95% repeatability limit of 0.29 mm for a translation of 10mm [18]. The position and orientation of each cadaver femur, tibia, and patella relative to the dynamic knee simulator were recorded using a probing tip with the Optotrak system.…”
Section: Cadaver Knee Measurements and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature could be interesting for variations if used in gait training. In addition, one can be confident that the generated movements are actual movements since the motion analysis method used here has a bias of 0.05° for angle measurement, well below the minimal amplitude measured in the present study, i.e., 0.8° ± 0.3° [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…1) Kinematic Validation A 3D motion capture system (Northern Digital Inc., Optotrak Certus) was used to calibrate and validate the WA orientation measured by iWA. The system is widely used in human movement analysis and has excellent accuracy characteristics in rotational (0.04°) and linear (0.03mm) motion [20]. The iWA sensor housing was instrumented with four active Infra-red (IRED) markers which were used to identify the iWA as a rigid body using calibration routines supplied with the motion capture software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%