1991
DOI: 10.1080/01483919108049692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy in the Determination of Recovery in HPLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the recovery is sometimes quite difficult to assess due to the interference of other endogenous compounds in sample matrices, spiking standards during method development were done by spiking the standards into a blank and carrying through the extraction. Our results showed a variation of GLS recovery between 89.0 and 108.6% ( Table 3 ), which according to literature [ 23 , 25 , 26 ] is acceptable and indicates good accuracy of the proposed HPLC method. In addition, the method showed good selectivity, since all GLS were well separated from each other with good resolution ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although the recovery is sometimes quite difficult to assess due to the interference of other endogenous compounds in sample matrices, spiking standards during method development were done by spiking the standards into a blank and carrying through the extraction. Our results showed a variation of GLS recovery between 89.0 and 108.6% ( Table 3 ), which according to literature [ 23 , 25 , 26 ] is acceptable and indicates good accuracy of the proposed HPLC method. In addition, the method showed good selectivity, since all GLS were well separated from each other with good resolution ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%