2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy evaluation of patient-specific 3D-printed aortic anatomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the digital processing of anatomical data provides a precise representation of the patient’s anatomy. Indeed, the digitization of patient-specific anatomy has gained momentum in recent years [ 45 - 47 ] and has moved beyond 3D printing [ 46 , 48 ]. It is envisaged that patient-specific digital anatomy could be a catalyst for changing and bridging the quality of personalized care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the digital processing of anatomical data provides a precise representation of the patient’s anatomy. Indeed, the digitization of patient-specific anatomy has gained momentum in recent years [ 45 - 47 ] and has moved beyond 3D printing [ 46 , 48 ]. It is envisaged that patient-specific digital anatomy could be a catalyst for changing and bridging the quality of personalized care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is an obvious risk of creating unrealistic anatomical findings when applying digital design and modification techniques, especially for engineers lacking medical education. The accuracy of 3D modeling and 3D printing, i.e., the dimensionally correct and complete representation of a patient’s anatomy reconstructed from a CT or MRI in the 3D model, has been investigated thoroughly [ 29 36 ]. The lack of a clinical dataset for comparison of the resulting model can potentially be a limiting factor of designing and modifying medical 3D models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean difference was equal to 1.0 mm (SD 1.0) and 1.2 mm (SD 0.9) for the first and second model. The other group assessed the accuracy of 3D aortic models manufactured for simulation purposes (28). The models were equipped with outlets and inlets for the connection to the perfusion system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is a lack of research that would determine the accuracy of 3D printed aortic templates. Only a few accuracy studies of aorta and aortic aneurysms have been reported to describe a very small number of cases (27)(28)(29). Importantly, it cannot be assumed that the accuracy of 3D models of solid organs and 3D aortic templates will be similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%