2000
DOI: 10.1128/.38.6.2117-2121.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Precision of Quantitative Calibrated Loops in Transfer of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

Abstract: Quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid are important in the diagnosis of ventilatorassociated pneumonia, and calibrated loops are commonly used to set up these cultures. In this study, the performances of calibrated 0.010-and 0.001-ml loops in the transfer of BAL fluid were determined. Five loops of one lot from seven manufacturers were tested. Calibrations were performed by the gravimetric method (0.010-ml loops) and the colorimetric method (0.001-ml loops). Most of the 0.010-ml loops dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total cell count was performed using a Fuchs Rosenthal haemocytometer chamber. Quantitative bacterial culture was performed as described previously [Jacobs et al, ]. Cytocentrifuged preparations [De Brauwer et al, ] were stained with May‐Grünwald Giemsa stain and Gram stain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total cell count was performed using a Fuchs Rosenthal haemocytometer chamber. Quantitative bacterial culture was performed as described previously [Jacobs et al, ]. Cytocentrifuged preparations [De Brauwer et al, ] were stained with May‐Grünwald Giemsa stain and Gram stain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All aliquots were pooled, except for the first one. The BALF samples were Gram-stained, and quantitative culture was performed as described previously [ 13 ]. The urea concentration was determined by means of an enzymatic conductivity rate method using the SYNCHRON LX System (Beckman Coulter BV, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands) as previously described [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy was expressed as the mean difference (in percentage) between expected and measured amounts (here, 1 ll). Precision was assessed by the agreement between repeated measurements, corresponding to intra-assay variability and expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) (standard deviation/mean) of the replicates (Jacobs et al 2000).…”
Section: Performance Of Calibrated Loops In the Transfer Of Fluoresceinmentioning
confidence: 99%