2004
DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:3:326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Precision of PIXImus Densitometry for Ex Vivo Mouse Long Bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specimens were subjected to two freeze thaw cycles, one prior to DXA, and the second prior to biomechanical testing. Using DXA we measured areal BMD of isolated femura twice with repositioning, as previously described [26]. Prior to biomechanical analysis, femora were gradually warmed by placing them at 4°C for at least 12 hours, and then allowing them to come to room temperature prior to analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens were subjected to two freeze thaw cycles, one prior to DXA, and the second prior to biomechanical testing. Using DXA we measured areal BMD of isolated femura twice with repositioning, as previously described [26]. Prior to biomechanical analysis, femora were gradually warmed by placing them at 4°C for at least 12 hours, and then allowing them to come to room temperature prior to analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured areal BMD of isolated femora by DXA as previously described [8]. Briefly, each bone was scanned twice with repositioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMD scans were preformed using a Lunar PIXImus II Densitometer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Positional scanning effects have been documented for PIXImus Densitometers. ( (20)) To determine whether scanning position affected the DXA used in this study, we recorded the x and y coordinates for each scan. Using ANOVA, we found no difference in BMD dependent on x ‐axis position; however, there was a small increase in BMD from top to bottom on the y ‐axis (right femur: r 2 = 0.01, p = 0.04; left femur: r 2 = 0.02, p = 0.006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%