2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.10.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linkage mapping of principal components for femoral biomechanical performance in a reciprocal HCB-8 × HCB-23 intercross

Abstract: Studies of bone genetics have addressed an array of related phenotypes, including various measures of biomechanical performance, bone size, bone, shape, and bone mineral density. These phenotypes are not independent, resulting in redundancy of the information they provide. Principal component (PC) analysis transforms multiple phenotype data to a new set of orthogonal “synthetic” phenotypes. We performed PC analysis on 17 femoral biomechanical, anatomic, and body size phenotypes in a reciprocal intercross of Hc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It encompasses 10 whole bone level phenotypes and displays LOD scores as high as 17.5 (shape factor), as well as double digit LOD scores for maximum load, outer major axis length, and cross-sectional area [Saless et al, 2009]. It is also linked to 3 of the 4 PC we constructed from the raw data, which together account for 80% of the overall phenotypic variance observed in the experiment [Saless et al, 2010a]. However, it is not linked to any material property phenotypes [Saless et al, 2010b].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It encompasses 10 whole bone level phenotypes and displays LOD scores as high as 17.5 (shape factor), as well as double digit LOD scores for maximum load, outer major axis length, and cross-sectional area [Saless et al, 2009]. It is also linked to 3 of the 4 PC we constructed from the raw data, which together account for 80% of the overall phenotypic variance observed in the experiment [Saless et al, 2010a]. However, it is not linked to any material property phenotypes [Saless et al, 2010b].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously mapped a robust, pleiotropic QTL for femoral size, shape, and biomechanical performance to a short region of chromosome 4 harboring Ece1 [15][16][17][18]. Femora of mice harboring HcB-23 allele are larger, stronger, and more brittle than those harboring the HcB-8 allele, implying an involvement of endothelin pathways in bone modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, HcB-8 and HcB-23 harbor different alleles at about one-fourth of the differential loci between the progenitor strains. Consequently, HcB-8 and HcB-23 bones differ substantially in the architecture and biomechanical performance of their femora, and we identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for multiple structural and biomechanical features of the femur and the mandible [15][16][17][18]. In brief, HcB-23 bones are larger and more elliptical in cross-section, stronger, and have higher bone mineral density than HcB-8 bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the greater complexity determining bone's mechanical properties rather than BMD or morphology, relatively little is known about mechanical genotype/phenotype relations. Genomic regions for bone's mechanical properties differ from QTLs identified for BMD [9,[18][19][20][21][22], not surprisingly because BMD as measured by DXA is only one of many factors that determine strength [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the greater complexity determining bone's mechanical properties rather than BMD or morphology, relatively little is known about mechanical genotype/phenotype relations. Genomic regions for bone's mechanical properties differ from QTLs identified for BMD [9,[18][19][20][21][22], not surprisingly because BMD as measured by DXA is only one of many factors that determine strength [23].QTL studies focusing on BMD or morphology of trabecular bone are less common than those targeting cortical bone [10,12]. QTL studies are often performed in mice, taking advantage of readily available genetic manipulations for follow-up studies [24], but the assessment of murine trabecular morphology requires high-resolution imaging methodologies such as micro computed tomography (μCT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%